Southeast Asian (ASEAN) Machinery Of War Discussion Thread

Welcome to Southeast Asian (ASEAN) Machinery Of War Discussion Thread! I hope you’ve brought your tea!

image

What is ASEAN?
ASEAN stands for Association of South East Asian Nations, an organization consisting of 10 Southeast Asian nations, which are

  • Thailand
  • Singapore
  • Philippines
  • Myanmar/Burma
  • Malaysia
  • Laos
  • Indonesia
  • Cambodia
  • Brunei
  • Vietnam

What is the purpose and goal of this thread?

The goals and purposes of this thread are to archive, compile, and discuss the vehicles used by the nations of Southeast Asia. As the Thai tech trees, ground, naval, and Air, as well as Indonesian ground tech itself have been passed to developers for consideration by the time of the creation of this thread, not to mention the appearance of Royal Thai Air Force’s F-5E FCU in Japanese tech tree, there is a high possibility of the inclusion and adding of more vehicles originated and used by Southeast Asian Nations into War Thunder. Therefore, in order to create a place for discussing and exchanging information regarding the Southeast Asian vehicles, this thread’s created and organized in order to accommodate and centralize such activities.

Portals for neighbor threads and discussions as well as some passed Suggestions as of the time of this thread creation

Thailand:
Idea and Discussion: Thailand As A Minor Nation - Machinery of War Discussion - War Thunder — official forum

Siam-Thailand Lineups For Japanese Tech Tree - Machinery of War Discussion - War Thunder — official forum

Thailand sub-tree : Ground tree - Suggestions - Devs / Passed - War Thunder — official forum

Thailand sub-tree : Aviation tree - Suggestions - Devs / Passed - War Thunder — official forum

Thailand sub-tree : Naval tree - Suggestions - Devs / Passed - War Thunder — official forum

General Japanese & Thai Ground Forces Discussion HQ - Machinery of War Discussion / Ground Vehicle - War Thunder — official forum

Indonesia:
Indonesian Sub-tree: Bhinneka Tunggal Ika! - Suggestions / Ground - War Thunder — official forum

Indonesian Aviation Sub-Tree: Bhinneka Tunggal Ika! - Suggestions - Devs / Passed - War Thunder — official forum

Singapore:
Singapore Ground Forces Sub-tree - Suggestions / Ground - War Thunder — official forum

14 Likes

Related Vehicle Suggestions List (Main SEA Nations)

Thailand

Summary

Ground:

Air:

Naval:

Heli:

  • N/A

Singapore

Summary

Ground:

Air:

Naval:

  • N/A

Heli:

  • N/A

Indonesia

Summary

Ground:

Air:

Naval:

Heli:


Malaysia

Summary

Ground:

Air:

Naval:

Heli:


Philippines

Summary

Ground:

Air:

Naval:

Heli:



8 Likes

If that ain’t suspicious, idk what is.

2 Likes

he might be a contributor thats why

I’d guess it might be a pleceholder for a list of pinned suggestions for ASEAN nations

Yeah, I said it more as a joke ;)

I am interested to see how Gaijin tackles the SAM issue with SEA. While there are capable sams, very few of them operate as single vehicle systems and thus would be radarless in game. As far as I am aware, the most powerful SAMs with radars in the region are Myanmar’s 2K22M Tunguska, followed by Laos’ Yitian ADS, Vietnam’s Modernized Shilka and in last place, Singapore’s UMI; none of which are really top tier worthy.

2K22M Tunguska - Myanmar - Likely ~10.3


image


2K22M / 2S6M Tunguska, equivalent to the 2S6 found in game without the 2S6M1 mod (no thermals or upgraded missiles).

Yitian ADS - Laos - Likely ~10.3

image
image


Yitian Air Defense System, armed with TY-90 & 12.7mm for self defense. Suggestion here.

ZSU-23-4M - Vietnam - Likely ~9.3

image
image


ZSU-23-4M, Shilka upgrade featuring Iglas & radar replaced with IR unit akin to Polish “Biala” upgrade. (Technically not a radar spaa anymore but I’m still putting it here, especially considering the lower BR).

M113A2 Ultra Mechanize Igla - Singapore - Likely ~9.0



M113A2 UMI, an M113 chassis featuring a search radar & Igla + FN Mag (7.62mm), as suggested by the name. Arguably one of the worst SAMs, inferior to shilka upgrades with igla due to gun. Suggestion here.

There are quite a few platforms without radar that are still potent such as the SPYDER SR system, URO VAMTAC RapidRanger & Singapore’s V-200 RBS-70, however, lacking a search mechanic vs advanced A2G systems such as the Su-25SM3 or F-16C can spell death by simple lack of awareness.

SPYDER SR - Singapore - Likely ~11.7"

image


SPYDER SR, an Israeli system similar to Type 81 (C) but with superior range; capable of firing Derby / Python 5 & operating independently from radar systems. Equipped with Toplite EOS, giving it superior optics to the Type 81 (C).

URO Vamtac RR - Indonesia - Likely ~10.3""


image


URO Vamtac RAPIDRanger, essentially a lightly armored car equipped with Starstreaks + a thermal FCS. Though both Malaysia also operates the system, Indonesia uniquely possesses LMM/Martlet which can be fired interchangeably with Starstreak from the system.

V-200 RBS-70 - Singapore- Likely ~10.0"


image


V-200 RBS-70, A Cadillac Gage Commando V-200 armed with RBS-70 + 2x FN Mag (7.62mm). Multiple sources indicate the acquisition of BOLIDE/RBS-70NG, thus putting the platform somewhere between the 9.7 Lvrbv 701apc & Radar equipped 10.3 ASRAD-R.

(There are aa few additional systems with Starstreak or Starburst hailing from Malaysia/Indonesia, I cannot be bothered.)

Hell, Thailand has this cursed thing.



(RBS-70 mounted on the roof of a TR Transformer II. I do not know which variant of RBS-70 Thailand has in inventory- though the launcher FCU appears to be a legacy unit.)


To address the special cases quickly:

  • Thai ADATS is static & lacks an individual radar. Even if it was implemented as carried on a transporter, it would still lack search capabilities & would be even more of a TD than current variants.

  • There currently isn’t sufficient evidence to support Thai Roland M3S or HVDS/ADAMs systems.

  • Myanmar has ordered Pantsir, but there are zero indications of their arrival and due to circumstances surrounding global events they may never arrive.

  • Myanmar does not & has never operated Tor systems of any kind- the source of the rumors is a series of articles which speculated they may have acquired Tor based on pictures of a transporter chassis. Said chassis was actually for the ‘Kvadrat-M’ (a Belarussian Kub upgrade), which itself is not eligible for the game.

Blogger SpeculatingLarger Blog / Article SpeculatingArticle Correctly Identifying

The Rumor has annoyingly persisted due to the older speculations being arguably easier to find than the later correct identification of the system as a boring Kub upgrade.


Regardless, if Japan is to receive ASEAN support, there isn’t much in terms of SAMs that would surpass their domestic options in terms of capabilities and of those with radars, most come from nations less likely to be integrated in a subtree with Japan (I certainly haven’t seen many Laos or Myanmar for Japan posts).

Will Gaijin add more complex SAM systems? Will Gaijin add something with little evidence such as the Roland M3s? Or will Japanese player be forced to scan the skies with their Mk.1 Eyeball.

8 Likes

M548 armed with a ZU-23-2 used by the PAVN during a exercise

m548zu23-2179979748

4 Likes

Here are some Malaysian ground vehicles we could get:

SIBMAS AFSV-90

image
image

Alvis Stormer w/ 20 mm Oerlikon

Cadillac Gage Commando w/ 20 mm autocannon

Cadillac Gage Commando w/Cockerill Mk3 90 mm cannon

Daimler Armored Car

Starstreak on URO VAMTAC 4x4

Astros II MLRS


It can also launcher the anti-tank FOG-MPM

DefTech AV8 w/ LCT 30 Turret AND ZT3 ATGMs

DefTech AV8 w/ Sharpshooter Turret, 25 mm. Also amphibious

ACV 300 ATGM variant

4 Likes

You forget the only 2 tanks they have ever operated!

PT-91M Pendikar


image

Polish T-72 modernization, sold to Malaysia (love the camo net!)

Scorpion 90mm

Though perhaps not as interesting as the Indonesian prototypes with upgraded optics & or LWS systems, Malaysia too operated the Scorpion 90 as their first true “tank”.

The PT-91M especially is important as one of the more advanced eastern style MBTs, it, along with the T-84 variant trialed by Malaysia (see below) make the perfect segue into the advanced Oplot-T of Thailand.

2 Likes

Man I hate those smoke launchers :D

Indonesia has smth similar;

Isuzu NPS75 with ZU-23-2

image

But also these trucks with triple Zastava M55

grafik

2 Likes

I can’t quite agree that Tuguska is 10.3, that thing has the same range as some top tier anti air(yes ADATS I’m talking about you)whilst having guns and a reasonably good radar.

The 2S6 in game is 10.7, but it’s the 2S6M1 mod which the better radar, thermals, and better missile. Myanmar only bought the base 2S6.

1 Like

Still, you really think 8km range should be 10.3? 2s6 should be 11.0 if not 11.3, and strela is currently 10.3, which is now fair.

Considering the current 2S6M1 of the USSR sits at 10.7, it would make no sense to have the 2S6M of Myanmar sit at the same BR when it is directly inferior, with 2 KM reduced range and no thermals.

A good comparison to Myanmar’s 2K22M/2S6M Tunguska is Sweden’s ASRAD-R; currently BR 10.3. while the Tunguska has access to guns, the ASRAD-R has access to a thermal channel for the gunner to improve target acquisition. The Tunguska’s missiles are slightly more maneuverable, but the BOLIDE of the ASRAD-R has slightly longer range. Overall, they are roughly comparable systems. Myanmar’s 2K22M/2S6M Tunguska fits well at 10.3, both in relation to the Soviet 2S6M1 and other 10.3 SAMs.

Alternatively, gaijin could add it ahistorically with the 2S6M1 module to be equivalent to the Soviet option. I think this is a cop out, but if you prefer that you might be able to push for it.

I think a 10.3 Tunguska better meshes with Myanmar’s other vehicles and what can be expected in the tree- especially given that if necessary, Gaijin could chose to add the Pantsir system they ordered to cover the higher tiers.

1 Like

I mean Strela is the most iconic 10.3 SAM, and with 3.5 km range IR missiles and no radar, I don’t think they are really equal, plus I want a BR extension so that they could be separate BR and top tier could be less compressed.

Those guns are actually what makes the Tunguska so strong compared with the Roland and bolide missile variants. Definitely 10.7 material, even with ‘only’ 8 km range

I think 2S6 should go 11.0 personally, I mean that is where type 81C sits with 8km range no radar and no gun.

Designer: How many smoke launchers you want?
Polish government: Yes.