Yep, Super Etendard
Forwarded thanks.
2 Likes
To you! o7
1 Like
Please let me know if there are any vehicles that can be added to the highest rank of Japanese tanks. lol Japan has fewer vehicles and aircraft that can be added than other trees, so I am seeking a sub-tree for one ASEAN member country such as Thailand.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT During the most recent Dev Server I have noticed a bug where the zoom levels of TGP MFD’s are overridden by having any TV/IR guided weapons. When you have them equipped the TGP MFD takes on the zoom levels of the TV/IR view and cannot be changed unless the TV/IR weapons are either dropped/unequipped from the loadout.
After doing some testing it looks like this affects all aircraft with both TGP MFD screens and access to carry TV/IR guided weapons.
I made a report on it and am hoping that you could forward it to the devs.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/KKHTbiFn3Zj3
Oplot-T and VT-4 (worse than current A1) plus BTR-3 series. Generally speaking, there are a damn lot of options from ASEAN region;
ASEAN Aviation Sub-TT suggestion (inlcuding Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines) is currently pending approval, Ground Sub-TT suggestion is WIP but we wait for the Feedback of said first one.
6 Likes
This of course all depends on which ASEAN nations go to Japan other than Thailand, if any.
Even not including ASEAN, there are still a few options, like the CCV and Type 11.
Type 96 MPMS and Chū-MPM. Both are multi-purpose missile launchers. That’s all I know, unless they want to add more prototypes like more Type 10 or Type 90 prototypes.
The Type 11 would have to wait until Gaijin decides how to add SPAA that require more than one vehicle. If I’m not mistaken it requires a separate radar vehicle like the Patriot system
It’s made to be fully used with another vehicle, however there is a targeting device that can be used in the case of only the missile vehicle being present, so it can be used independently.
1 Like
I didn’t know that. Another fun thing at least according to its wiki page is they can technically add 2, each on a different kind of chassis.
That’s true. I wouldn’t mind either, however the Toyota Mega Cruiser one would be funny.
Here’s a thread about it, in case you’re interested in reading more Type 11 Tan-SAM Kai II - An Appreciated SAM for the JGDSF: Part 2 - Suggestions - Devs / Passed - War Thunder — official forum
3 Likes
anything new for it?
And with the upcoming Ammo crates these kind of vehicles with low missile count can be more in line with comparable vehicles.
1 Like
Indeed.
Any reason this new devserver update made the game a blurry MESS? It looks like I have dlss on but it isnt (dlss is horrible). I will genuinely not be able to play it looks so gross. And for anyone who may ask for my settings, TSAA 4x SSAA no dlss is my AA settings, all others on max possible. And it still persists with ray traycing on or off. I have the newest I7 and a 4070 for gpu/cpu run on 2K res, and avg 60-80fps it isnt a hardware ossue or fps issue. My issue is how unplayable the blur is. (I have motion blur off) Ill make a bug report when im home from work. But i can always show a screen shot comparision from dev/live here if needed.
Same thing, but without APS, right?
also when Gaijin says it cant come because it needs a second vehicle to operate or this thing
why dont they just let us build/deploy this thing, bam problem solved.
i see no issue since we can build ammo crate and we would get a text like “you need to setup the Designator to be able to fire missiles” if we try to fire without it.
Pros: we can use these vehicle who can funktion with such a Designator
Cons: time for setup needed ( i gues 2-3sec woudnt be a issue) and we are inmobile as long we dont pack it up gain
That shouldn’t even be a problem, since there’re some vehicles in game that would never be used unless the supports are deployed.