Yep he is just making videos because main are upset and paint the forums in a bad light even though he have a discord channel with dangerous people moderating it.
I say this if he thinks it’s ok to laugh at the forums then he need to look at the TEChub.
That he doesn’t even moderate it.
Because there are no damn “rules” regarding that. You are just making up these “rules” in your head to try to make sense out of/find logic behind something that just makes no sense/has no logic.
It sounds harsh, but you wouldn’t be the first not last person to do something like that.
It’s between the F-16A and mid-block C/D models in terms of performance so theoretically it would fit the bill for any patch going forward.
Only issue would be sourcing data on it, but they could ballpark it reasonably close since the J-10 is “similar looking” and “totally not developed directly from the Lavi”.
PL-8, Python 3, I mean totally different missiles.
Just to clarify here we said for some time Italy would be the home of some minor axis nations and home to Hungarian vehicles for some time. Hungary is now also a fully confirmed sub tree of Italy.
We have never stated anywhere that every single Australian vehicle will go to the British tree. We have never said the same about Canadian vehicles either. We also do not have or currently plan to have an Australian or Canadian sub tree for the UK. Vehicles from nations that do not have a predesignated home do not have a set “rule” that you are applying here that just because all of their existing vehicles in game are in a single tree, that other vehicles cannot be added to other trees depending on the relevance and need for that nation / role.
The M1 AIM and Leopard C2 you keep referencing both had other connections and positions to fill in other trees. As such, there are no plans to move them to the British tree currently or simply flat outright make the UK tree the “Commonwealth tree” and that every single vehicle from the Commonwealth will 100% come to the UK tree. Simply, Commonwealth vehicles or vehicles with connections too it may be used to bolster the British trees needs.
Respectfully. Can you tell me where the UK had any involvement in the T-90S Bhishma project? It must’ve happened after the initial Bhishmas, and it must be some very niche material Gaijin is in possession of, that informs you of how they could be connected. Nothing anyone has found online thus far suggests that the UK had anything to do at all with the project, or even the on-going assembly of the Russian kits, or manufacturing of Indian domestic armor and computerization upgrades.
As I expected sub tree without historical nation involvement is a bad idea it should be rework about entire sub tree stuff now is just put random bs into nation that didn’t even be a part of development vehicles