Ah ok :-)
Mirage 4000 needs to go down in BR or the the BRs need to be decompressed.
It is at 13.0 with no fox-3s while the SU-30MKK is is at 13.3. It has 0 chance in a 1v1 with that airplane.
Mirage 4000 13.0 → 12.7
5 Likes
Vehicle: F4J (UK)
BR: 12.0 → 11.3 SB
Reason:
Its not much different to the FGR2 and FG1, different engines that perform worse at low altitude but better at higher altitude but its not too significant in gameplay aspects
A worse RWR as it is the default “?” to everything ever except for SAM warnings which it detects making its situational awareness much lower
It lacks the long range sparrows the american F4J has as well as a HMS because it never used them (or not the AIM 7F specifically, did use skyflash supertemp)
Besides that is near enough the same plane with the same missiles and such but is a much higher br
4 Likes
Less CMs than the FGR2/FG1 as well.
I have no idea why they are at different BRs other than because it’s a premium
90%? Thanks for the laugh.
The changes are actually great. They even removed controversial ones like the F8U, while putting in changes that the community have long requested - Turms III / BI. Some of you just love to whinge.
No one uses the BI in GRB, lol.
2 Likes
Additionally move the F-16I Sufa to 13.7 in Simulator battles please
That’s a good point. I’ll add it to the list.
Sure lets buff the already super OP Russian bias mobile with average K/D of nearly 3. (sarcasn just in case its not clear)
Stats from last month
So my proposal
Vehicle: KV-220
Ground Realistic: 6.0 → 6.3
10 Likes
They do in SQBs.
1 Like
Range is a terrible excuse.
MICA has comparable range to the R-77 and the Su-27 gets the R-27ER.
Even so, long range isn’t meta.
Close range performance is more important.
Unfortunately squadron battles are based off the ground br and are the most common place to find the BI and it is extremely strong there bc its lack of fuel is much less of an issue in a smaller map where theres near guaranteed kills every game
Bombers are no match and most fighters cant deal with it in such a scenario
2 Likes
Fair enough, I don’t play them. In the thousand + 7.0 games I’ve played since September in normal GRB, I can count on one hand the amount of times I’ve seen a BI. Yak and Su 9 spam, typically. Didn’t know they were common in SQB.
If the F-4S is moving down in GRB so should the slightly worse F-4J. The payload is identical and it’s missing the leading edge slats of the 4S.
1 Like
In navy, maximum uptier need to be maximum 0.4.
early destroyers facing cruisers cannot deal anything.
same for early cruisers vs battleships…
That the only way to make naval enjoyable in regular battles!
makes them too much money
The worst thing about War Thunder is its players.
Money dictates decisions, that is a fact.
People who dish out money just because they can ruin the game for everybody else.
I can’t blame Gaijin for the BMPT or for the SU-30MKK really.
Stop playing 10.3+ (soon 10.7+), boycott the rank, I barely touch it nowdays, I’ve found peace in 8.7.
3 Likes
Sdkfz. 234/2 (Puma)/Biele – Rank II —> Rank III
[Reasoning]: Germany is the only nation without a Rank III light tank, and the Puma is quite a good vehicle, regularly being brought up into even the 5.0-6.0 bracket and doing reasonably well. It would fit in at Rank III very easily and fill a crucial gap in the German TT at the same time.
11 Likes
M24(TL)/AMX-13-M24 – Rank II —> Rank III
[Reasoning]: I forgot about these two in my previous recommendation for putting all M24’s at Rank III, and since they have now all been hit with a BR decompression, it would only make sense that these two move up as well
(I genuinely didn’t even know the TL existed, lol)
8 Likes
Thank you all for your suggestions. The topic will now closed.
If you want to discuss specific vehicle, please use Arcade/Realistic/Simulator section of General Discussion.
11 Likes