Suggestions Passed to the Developers for January 2025 is here.
6 Likes
Honestly long overdue, been seen in the files for years so hopefully we are a step closer to seeing it escape from CDK jail.
1 Like
Looking at the vehicles, only the Chinese M10 jumps out as something I’m interested in with the passing to Devs.
However, the other stuff is neat.
Histrocal anime thing:
Ooo- this one is 100% needed:
And this sounds useful:
2 Likes
Honestly why not just go straight to ASM-3 for ground targets and remove the ambiguity? Can always add the ASM-1 and 2 for anti-shipping role or novelty at a later time.
1 Like
Something went wrong with the name:
Looks inside:
“San Giorgio Class, Destroyer, San Marco D563”
Lol I was right lmao
Only off by about half an hour
1 Like
Still got it within the hour tho which is impressive from just a troll guess lol
Because the ASM-2 really isn’t a problem anymore with the AGM-119 being added.
It uses a similar IIR seeker, which we now see Gaijin allows to be used against tanks. While IOG is needed outside of the IR seeker range to provide a flight path while the missile gets in range, within range of the seeker it would essentially feel no different in use than the IR Maverick variants.
For the ASM-2B it even uses GPS before the seeker activates, which would make it more effective at range, though I don’t think Gaijin would add that too soon.
ASM-3 would require anti radiation missile mechanics to be added, and even then couldn’t fill the role an ASM-2 could in game considering the average MBT doesn’t carry a radar.
So both have their place in game, but ASM-2 could be added sooner.
Erhh gaijin you do know you planned that for an update right lol
" Other Nations
1 Like
What about gripen E vs F-15EX or QA
Yf-23 would be realy cool but i its to advanced for now
1 Like
F-15 advanced eagle is losing to a gripen E 9/10, regardless of model
Beats it in radar and EW probably due to just size and tech (F-15 is a big jet), but yeah considering meteor vs 120D. I think would swing back in EX favor if it got AIM-260 which have already been tested on most of not all aircraft that will use it
Not really it would probably have only sidewinder or pitbull amraams, no radar
All it has is stealth and M1.72 supercruise
AIM-260 is still too early in development to say it’s definitively better than a Meteor, however the Gripen E is a light fighter with more than enough missiles to continually pressure an Eagle into defending while simply notching with the 300 odd chaff and amazing DASS suite, it’s radar is better due to having some of the best sensor fusion on earth and playing perfectly into it’s other sensors and AI assistant, finally in a dogfight the only F-15 that stands a chance against a gripen is the A
1 Like
Gaijin would probably give it the Yak-141 treatment and give it stuff it never had which they believe it maybe would have gotten had it entered service.
Fair enough on the Meteor vs 260
But F-15EX has 360 standard CM, and can put Britecloud 218 on each of those. Then there is the BOL pods which US F-15C has, and since EX replacing C I think it’ll get those. As F-15EX has 8 amraam rails on wings that’s 8 BOL pods, each has 160 CM, you can see where I’m going with this. All of this integrated with BAE System’s Inc. excellent EPAWSS ECM suite (ty LM Sanders!)
F-15EX and F-15E also got ADCP II computer and EX has full glass cockpit, and is a fully digital aircraft. I’m sure it has just as much sensor fusion if not more, combined with the chunky F-15 radar it’ll outrange the Gripen E detection. AI assistant is something that might come in future software update but as of right now doesn’t have it.
I cannot argue with dogfight ability since that’s pretty much just a fact.
Id rather they just keep it as realish as possible to keep it at a F-117 type BR, maybe 13.0