This, exactly, right here. and we only have two ways we can go about fixing this.
A. How sub-trees work/added is changed.
or
B. We resume adding new independent nations.
6 Likes
Right, I almost forgot to advertise the rework suggestion again!
9 Likes
USSR MiG-17PF like hungarian from italy tech tree
But yes soviet tech tree no MiG-17PFU
2 Likes
You sir(?) are doing the good work.
We’d have half as many of the problems we do now when talking about nations to be added in the future if that was how sub-trees were in the first place, as that gets rid of the fundamental problems of sub-trees well also keeping what made them a good idea in the first place.
3 Likes
Which I think is a bit of a double standard
Why is it OK to continously add vehicles of one warring party each update, but none of the other?
Here you go
6 Likes
Ah yes, modern gunships
Spoiler
Why would they even consider adding something like that?
1 Like
¯\ _ (ツ) _ /¯
1 Like
7 Likes
Oh, this would be nice.
4 Likes
oh my…
anti tank vespa yess I want it
13 Likes
Too OP, has more armour than several top tier MBTs :P
2 Likes
Italian Maus?!?
7 Likes
Why is it so bulbous, it looks over pressurized
1 Like
For the memes.
I just want my AC-130 I don’t care if it would be awful I can make my own fun
There’s so many aircraft that would be god awful to play in real games but that could be fun in other ways. Like again the AC-130 and other gunships, some weaponised transports like the UH-1Y (might not be bad since it’s basically just a modern Huey) and even the V-22 (trialled with chin mounted guns, a belly mounted turret like what is on the AH-60 and Hydra rocket pods I believe).
2 Likes
I would like to see M18 Commander with ragdoll physics.
3 Likes
I do wonder whether AC-130, MLRS, etc should be added as alternative to artillery (im not proposing CoD style killstreaks here) not that you can control where the hits land anymore than you can with the regular artillery we have now. But perhaps with different kinds of hits
MLRS = bigger but fewer impacts over a wider area but more serverly impacted by terrain and buildings due to angles
AC-130 = Wider range of impact types, wider area than standard artilllery, but faster call in time.
Or something to that effect, but at its core. Its more aesthetic differences.
1 Like
Don’t get me wrong, I would love to see things like the Osprey or some of the ACs, but I really don’t see how you could make them work at all.
If they get guided weapons they can’t go to a low enough BR to be useable and if they are limited to turrets they would just be bombers with fewer or even no bombs
They could be ok in Sim, like a lot of aircraft that are bad in RB they can be somewhat effective in Sim.
1 Like