The closest thing to a Canadian Mk V Centurion we have is the Australian Mk 5/1, but that was a battle pass or an event vehicle
It depends; we used both the 5/1(at home) and 5/2(in Europe).
Also isn’t the Aussie 5/1 7.7 well the tank being removed is 8.3
2 Likes
Still think Czechoslovakia is far more viable, especially for early rank stuff.
1 Like
That is…very, very historically accurate, worringly.
Edit: i just re-read the message and got what you mean. Niech żyje Polska
1 Like
Both the Swedish one and Aussie one are at 7.7 but yea we can’t get both now and the tank at 8.3 is the Indian. So making a permanent 7.7 Centurion could work. Plus would make us understand why they moved the RAM now of all updates. Also it’s a C&P so it would be easier for them. lol
2 Likes
Yea many people don’t know what happened to the Polish part from the Invastion, Warsaw Uprising and the ghetto’s that just the tip of the iceberg.
AGM-45A-1, AGM-45B-2, AGM-45A-3A & AGM-45B-4 ?
AGM-122 Sidearm from Aircraft loading, AV-8B
Credit : Natops Flight Manual Performance Charts Navy Model AV-8B/TAV-8B Aircraft, page 29
At this point I am legitimately sceptical if we will ever see another tech tree. As sad as it is, the most “hype” nations are already represented (other than Ua, whose implementation is out of the question currently). Additionally, assuming Gaijin wants to give every nation a vehicle per patch (funny I know), it increases work load for questionable benefit, incentivising c&p.
On the other hand, subtrees require less effort and guarantee a certain level of investment from players already grinding the host nation, in addition to people excited for representation, so they will probably keep coming.
When players discussed the leaked list
Gaijin:
12 Likes
I mean there only do much they can add without the host tree becoming totally unrecognizable.
Like the sub we know off are,
Japan - Thailand, Indonesia and props Singapore (Unconfirmed but Likely)
China - Pakistan, Bangladesh and North Korea (Unconfirmed but Likely)
Germany - Switzerland (Unconfirmed but Likely)
Poland (Unknown for who an in what way)
Like that 8 nations right there
3 Likes
Unconfirmed but Confirmed, but not from Gaijin
I mean Smin said they are for Germany atm iirc
I was Joking more in direction of the leaks )))))
1 Like
That could be the best way to implement South Korea, just as a really, really big sub tree of Poland.
The problem is we are both running out of room and that sub-trees are screwed over both the host and the sub.
Sub-trees are easier because Gaijin uses them to add C&P to fix the host tree. Not to give representation to the sub-tree. After all all unique sub-tree vehicles end up as events.
To me, anyone asking for a sub-tree wants ALL unique vehicles as events and wants C&P to buff the host.
It’s why I’ve become completely anti-sub-tree. As you’d be lucky to see one unique TT vehicle out of a nation that had enough for a 5-lined tree if it became a sub-tree.
3 Likes
Itd be damn shame if israel was the last tech tree tbh. What a waste.
6 Likes
I mean the Spit’s wasn’t as those 80mm rockets were fun as hell and would pen king tigers lol
I dont know about Poland.
If it would come as a standalone TT we get less vehicles per nation per update.
Since the total amount of vehicles hasnt gone up with the addition of extra nations.
This could also increase the amount of C&P vehicles as TT additions, while saving the unique ones for events, battlepasses and premiums (basically Hungary, Finland, Taiwan, BeNeLux and Switzerland).
But Poland as a standalone would also have more TT uniques as Gaijin would be forced to add unique vehicles as TT to fill it out when they don’t have to with sub-trees.
1 Like
Plus I will add most in game nations are almost finished anyway as why do you think gaijin resorted to add subs.
1 Like