Purpose:
-
The purpose of this thread is give the devs a short and compact feedback about certain design flaws on specific maps at specfic BRs within Air RB. If you want to discuss Ground RB maps, please create your own thread.
-
We had a similar (and pinned) thread in the old forum - but within the new forum gaijin seeks to minimize pinned threads, so if this thread gets popular (meaning input and likes) i was told that they might consider this thread to be pinned too.
-
A hell of maps have basic design flaws, but they were discussed mostly within other threads - as there is no consolidation. In addition some highly experienced players abuse these flaws, whilst the overwhelming majority has no clue about them.
-
To give a clear example:
If you read this post, combined with this and this post, you might agree that map design flaws leading to inevitable ticket wins/defeats are highly destructive for player motivation and commitment.
I mean if you can win a match with doing nothing (0 score) as you know that ai will win for you there is no point to keep such a map in rotation.
Feedback:
-
Feedback in its best form is short & structured, therefore it would be great if all posts would follow a certain pattern:
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
3. Short description of the design flaw
4. Recommended solution
-
Example (and first entry):
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
[Operation] Kamchatka
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
BR 3.7 - 4.7
3. Short description of the design flaw
Map has only 5.400 tickets (standard maps have 7.600 tickets) - in full 16 vs 16 matches the matches end often way too quick by tickets whilst you are in the middle of a dogfight.
4. Recommended solution
Add 22 ground units to bring the ticket count to 7.600 like on most other maps.
Some housekeeping:
-
3rd party readers which share the view on the mentioned design flaw are asked to like the respective post. People which have a deviating opinion might create an own entry instead of starting individual discussions - we have simply enough of them.
-
Have in mind that discussions about the design flaw will not help anybody - as they will just distract from the flaw itself and a convoluted feedback thread helps nobody - just look at official feedback threads, most of them are filled with more or less useless discussions.
-
From my perspective CMs and Forum mods try their best to support players if feedback is provided constructive and addressed in a civil manner - so it in case you care about the game - stay polite.
-
The CMs and Forum mods might bundle our feedback to the devs if enough people participate - either with likes or own entries. Have in mind that the forum is full with threads and posts discussing certain maps, impact of ai “activities” or just basic design flaws - for ages without any chance for a compact feedback addressed to the devs.
Thanks for your time reading this.
Have a good one!
5 Likes
2nd entry:
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
[Front Line] Kuban
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
3.7 - 4.7
3. Short description of the design flaw
AI planes are not equally balanced.
Both teams have ai planes supporting them. The team with the airfield located near Abinskoye gets ai Il2s, the team with the airfield near Krymskaya gets ai Hs 129s.
The flaw is that the Il-2s spawn early game, whilst the Hs 129 spawn late game. So the Il-2 kill tickets early vs a full enemy team, whilst the Hs 129s kills tickets late game when just a few enemy players are alive.
That means that the Hs 129s have a higher impact as they face less opponents and they are so effective that you can win by stalling the match untill they arrive. I explained this in detail in this post.
4. Recommended solution
Ensure that both ai plane formations appear at the same time.
2 Likes
3rd entry:
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
[Operation] Battle for the Rhine
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
BR 3.7-4.7
3. Short description of the design flaw
Tickets are too low compared to most other maps.
This is an old (but revised) map. Instead of having 7.600 tickets this map has only 5.400. This leads to very fast matches if both teams managed to kill all enemy bases (= ~1200 tickets gone) and when ai planes on both sides kill enemy ground units.
From my pov 85-90% of matches end with ticket wins or defeats in less than 10 minutes, even if a substantial number of players are still alive. Usually the matches end whilst you are in the middle of a dogfight…
4. Recommended solution
Add 20 more ground units for both teams and set the spawn point of ai planes a few kilometers away from the current location so that they need longer to the battlefield.
2 Likes
4th entry
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
[Front Line] Kursk
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
BR 3.7 - 4.7
3. Short description of the design flaw
Ground ai kills each other too fast.
Team A has tank columns trying to break through fortified positions of Team B. Even without player interactions the ai tanks and pillboxes kills each other way too fast. If you watch this replay you will see that the team with tanks has an advantage, as they manage to kill enemy arty and pillboxes way faster than the tanks die. I won 1 vs 6 due to this. To be fair, the decisive reason why i won was that my team killed all 3 non-respawning bases (=mission objective) - and the enemy team none. The resulting ticket lead was large enough to compensate the 20+ ground kills of the enemy team. The ticket advantage was large enough that my ai tanks killed the enemy ticket after ~ 16 minutes.
4. Recommended solution
Place the tank columns 2-4 kilometers back so that they can’t end the match without PvP action.
3 Likes
5th entry:
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
[Operation] Poland
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
BR 3.7 to 5.0
3. Short description of the design flaw
Unbalanced airfield aaa (af aaa) - one is functional, the other not
Poland is an old but revised 3 bases map with just one airfield for each team.
Every experienced prop player knows that on this map the af aaa on one side is useless (=meaning you can turnfight above the enemy af at any altitude) and the af aaa on the other side is functional, but not up to 4 km as usual, somehow on this map u get unharmed if you stay above 3.300-3.500 meters.
So team A can easily repair & rearm, the other not. A hell of players are not aware of this and become easy kills whilst landing - as experienced players know this and are able to exploit this.
4. Recommended solution
Align af aaa effectiveness on both airfields - so that we have either both af aaa useless or both functional - just to have the same level of protection.
3 Likes
6th entry:
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
[Operation] New Guinea
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
BR 3.7 - 4.7
3. Short description of the design flaw
Ground targets (no bases on this map) not marked like on (almost) every other map.
On this rather rare Pacific map (setup always JP vs US/UK) ticket bearing ground ai units are not marked on the map. They appear on the minimap only if players get below 2.000 - 2.500 meters. Due to missing bases US/UK bombers (unaware of the ground units) either try to attack Japanese carriers - or they simply jump out.
Japanese bombers usually dive and attack visible ground units (3 destroyers) which have zero ticket value - just because they are unaware of the hell of ground units (pillboxes, arty, light tanks).
I wrote a “map guide” here.
4. Recommended solution
Make at least pillboxes (for JP players) and medium tanks (for US/UK players) visible in order to support players unaware of the “hidden” ground targets.
2 Likes
7th entry:
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
[Front Line] Korsun
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
BR 3.7 - 4.7
3. Short description of the design flaw
Unbalanced as just one team gets support by ai planes (Il-2s).
On this very old map just on team has ai planes attacking ground units. Unmolested the damage they inflict is decisive in tight matches. On top of that: Killing those ai planes has zero ticket value - in order to see a ticket impact you have to kill 60-80% of them.
4. Recommended solution
Either delete the ai Il-2s or give the other team also ai planes to create a fair balanced setup.
2 Likes
8th entry:
1. Name of the map like mentioned on the official replay site
[Operation] Kamtschatka
2. BR at which this design flaw pops up
BR 3.7 to 4.7
3. Short description of the design flaw
Bomber spawn for team spawning on the north is way too far in the back.
Bomber spawns are on almost all other maps always in front of own interceptors but close to the own main airfield. On this map the bomber spawn for the team spawning in the north is ~ 11 km behind the main airfield - and behind own interceptors.
Whilst the idea of spawning behind (but above) own interceptors is rather interesting it makes no sense to limit this for one team only.
Results from my pov:
-
Slow and bad climbing bombers like Bv 238s or Sterlings run either in no enemy interceptors (as those were neutralized by own ICs) or against the full enemy team way before they can drop - just because it takes too long to close the distance - and airfield spawn fighters are able to intercept them.
-
The chances for players of B-25s or Do 217s to get to a base decrease as their speed run approaches (=fast in, fast out) relies highly on the distance to the bomb target.
4. Recommended solution
Align bomber spawns for both teams to balance the odds. Preferred: Like everywhere else…
2 Likes
Poland also has a ridiculously broken ticket bleed, which, when combined with the forward air spawn of high speed attack aircraft at these BRs (Wyvern, Do-335, Me-410) they can end the match before the red v blue merge.
Even if the match doesn’t end, there is no way to prevent the waterfall effect on tickets caused by the initial wave of attackers who can not be intercepted by aircraft taking off from their airfield.
2 Likes