As did I. Well, I also tried to turn fight Mig-21s in a stock FGR2 and when that innevitably didnt work. I stuck with base bombing whislt I learnt the gamemode. I think I may have become the CCRP expert now on the forums as a result :P
Oh I understand why they do it, I just don’t understand why they ask others to ignore them, and I’d expect more reaction from them when I do go near them
I actually can’t use CCRP, but I don’t need to because CCIP is good enough for me… until my blind ass can’t see the base
Yeah, but that is just what some people will do and I doubt they think its against the rules.
I mostly use it to loft bombs. With SPAA so brutal, lofting means I can totally avoid the SPAA. Just wish the HUD symbology was correct/complete. But yeah, it does help with finding bases as well. Sometimes they are nearly invisible
Took me 5 minutes of flying around a spot just to see it once- then I flew over it and lost it again
I don’t know how, and can’t be bothered learning
Been there done that, gotten that t-shirt. Even a few times more recently than I care to admit
Also, heres one I made earlier, if you ever want to
Spoiler
Yeaaaa I might try thanks!
Well said
So we can call on enemies in our normal matches to come to a truce and not kill each other, and that’s fine?
Is that what you’re trying to say is fine?
Because that’s what the issue has been the entire thread…
One on one, it’s not a problem, but it’s the mass enagement with the enemy to farm that is the actual issue here…
If you’ve seen it on the SA servers, then how prolific is that on that set of servers, and how many are doing it, because if you even have 4-6 people doing it, that’s still not the same as a small light tank finding a large enemy and wanting to hang about.
VERY different.
It’s conspiring with the enemy, on a grander scale.
I’ve always taken even talking to the team to tell them that someone is in an area, is even bad behaviour… But calling on truces to avoid engaging, is a whole other level…
If one person asks for a truce and no one responds but continues to engage in the same PvE activity they were before. Does that constitute consent/collusion?
In my opinion, it means nothing at all and the only person that “might” be in violation of any rules in the person who asked.
You have different tiers
-
A lobby in which most are just doing PvE
-
A lobby where most are doing PvE and someone asked for PvE only in all chat
-
A PvE lobby with people enforicng that PvE with tactics like abusive messages and TKs
-
A lobby created and populated with pre-planned people explicity for farming
First 1, not “illegal” at all. Second, technically bad, but not a big deal
Last 2, very bad.
How’s it not the same?
Is someone doing PvE in a “PvE lobby” automatically guilty of violating the EULA?
You have spent the last hour trying to say they were. So how do you prove it?
What is a rule violation and what isn’t?
Even if it’s not enforced and merely accepted, it makes all the genuine players of that mode lose out because they get to do it all in safety, without hostility…
@Bunny_宝妮 I don’t think you thought the issue through, and this guy is using your statements to try and make out that it’s alright.
I think this needs to actually be addressed because there are actual problems with allowing this to even be… Chances are some have already ground out the BP with it, and the current crafting event without a single actual hostility and more consented kills.
Just wastes all the effort that anyone legitimately puts into the game.
But what denotes “Acceptance”?
Should I immediately quit that match? Switch aircraft? Start hurling abuse at the guy? What am I suppose to do?
If they ask once and press it no further, then I just ignore them and go about my buissness, if they start repeatedly asking, I’d report it using the in-game function. But regardless of a “PvE lobby” or not, I employ the same tactics and in the same manner. If I do it right, I shouldnt see other players.
If someone PvPs and someone starts getting shitty. Then I report them. But if nothing happens or there is no PvP. (it happens if the match is quiet) then it doesnt prove anything. Only that no one has found anyone yet
You’re not calling into the enemy, to not engage… This is what those rooms and the insinuation behind them entails.
I’m sure this breaks the EULA as much as having someone sit on a cap, cap, then back off to let the enemy cap, and so on… I seen someone mentioning a pair did that in a random match and ended up with 20 caps…
It does, technically.
But the point Im trying to press is that simply being in one of those lobbies doesnt denote guilt automatically.