Yes but instead it will sustain like 10 degrees a second beyond its top speed
1 Like
its on quite a few export f16s I’m not sure if the US owns them or uses them though ill find some images ill edit this post with them.(ignore this its on 1 single export f16A from the looks)
okay I found the image however… something feels off about it I don’t know why and I’m not sure how much I trust it considering it seems to come from a Pakistan nationalist military blogger.
only thing I know about it is its on the f16A block 5 or something that Pakistan has, Its the only one I’ve seen that isn’t a render for the bolck70/72 triple rack found it from one of the f16 discussions last year
god I missed when this one was ongoing it gave me so much enjoyment watching people use DCS renders to confirm there beliefs.
either way I’m very unsure now the block 50 from what I can see wouldn’t be capable of it but if were luck since they did perform tests with the triple rack and it was designed for the f16V maybe just maybe we might get it just as real as the MRML pylons we have on the f15.
okay side tracked found this image while looking and wanted to share the outward AMRAAM’s look so godamn silly on the f22
If US does not use it then they might not get it.
Anyways this would be fire!!!
2 Likes
PoBIT is going to get wrecked at 14.7 with or without the double pylons. Flight performance wise it just can’t keep up with the EFT and Rafale and BVR wise the Su-30SM2 and EFT likely beat it due to their much better radar.
This looks like a very bad fake imo. The amraams look waaaay too big.
EDIT: Lookin as the left amraam racks it’s definitely a fake.,
1 Like
hydra pod for amraams would be hilarious,
he is using the wrong charts, here is more info about where he is wrong
What can save American top tier air? - #999 by Alpharius11348
2 Likes
I think this is a misleading post 102% trim isn’t full afterburner as depicted in your screen shot. It’s an afterburner level iirc for the f15A it’s 105% = max afterburner.
No as per the manual, the 100 engine the 102% throttle is maximum war time power.
The eagles with the 220 engine in game have correct performance.
1 Like
Wrong bro.
That was for the 100 engine and the F-15A is overperforming.
The 220 eagles are fine as we tested before.
Im with the other guy. F16C is the worst 13.7 i can think of too.
Grippy, f15jm, j10, j11b, su27sm, f2 all>
Maybe the su34 is worse? Not sure, never used it. Theres a f16 with 45 cms at 13.7 IIRC so that too
1 Like
F-16A OCU and belgian F-16AM are arguably worse than the F-16C.
2 Likes
Yh the one with 45cms has got to be pure pain
you were claiming that that was applicable to the F15C, that has the -220 engines
and this is a thread about the F15C with -220 engines
I was not
I already told you the 220 engined F-15C is fine
yes…
after I proved that it was
before that you were saying it wasnt
Mate, you didn’t prove anything we just tested it independently. Its only .06 Mach too fast and that’s not a big deal IMO.
Just checked the other f16 out u mentioned.
No HMD at 13.7… the game gets worse the more you learn. So it has more CMs than the f16s at 13.3 but that doesn’t usually warrant a BR difference (netz mod 3 x the cms than the netz same BR). Am I missing something? Or is the game really just straight up slop
The f16 with 45CMs also has no HMD, just lol
I stand corrected. F16C actually now somehow looking good
yes I did, you were blatantly wrong
the top comment here was about F-15EX
like wtf, how can you be crazy enough to deny that you were wrong here
Its also charts for 2 different types of CFT
-3 and -4
FAST packs and CFT variants are different and have different drag indexs.
yes, hence why the charts I used to disprove you were using the same kind of CFT as the ones you were referencing