Considering that South Korea has a similar number of vehicles to Israel and adding North Korea to it would make it a very large tree, yeah, neither should be sub nations.
3 Likes
I do worry that the one thing stopping Gaijin is the fact the air tree would be largely copy-paste. North Korea only really have 2-2.5 domestic aircraft, one of which is the attacker passed to devs just now. The other is a rank 1 bomber. Everything else is directly Soviet/Chinese or Soviet/Chinese with some modifications (like the Shenyang F-5 in-game). And the tree stops at the MiG-29 9.13.
South Korea has quite a few unique variants of foreign aircraft and also a handful of fully indigenous ones for tier 6 onward, which is similar to Israel, so coupled with the fact that South Korea has a massive number of gamers, which Gaijin very obviously would love to tap into, that shouldn’t be much of a problem for United Korea.
1 Like
Let’s hope the leaks are wrong about Korean subtrees to China and the US then 🙏
2 Likes
It was wrong about the Typhoon coming in 2025, so let’s hope things have changed, yes.
2 Likes
Would be cool as an event vehicle or maybe a squadron vehicle. Might even be a premium but I don’t know whether Gaijin wants to add a premium F-16 yet.
Everyone’s getting a AH-64E passed before the US
Hold on Air RB EC? That’s unexpected but definitely welcome.
Again another surprising suggestion passed. Would be great seeing as basically half your RP goes to waste in a spaded vehicle.
Have they just got the link name wrong for this? The suggestion that is linked is for Radar HUD IFF indicator Update. Or maybe they have got the wrong suggestion, this is the suggestion for Terrain Following Radar
I wws hoping they’d add the ATGM version first, I guess there’s still time.
Yes! Finally the Luchs passed to devs!
On the Arjun, do y’all think they’ll add the PCB round?
Probably, it’s basically just SAP.
The Ingwes have been great on the ratel since the buff
I was hoping it would bring the ZT3s fire on the move capabilities
That would be nice, any idea why that’s not possible with the ratel?
Cuz Gaijin says so.
That is the only reason.
2 Likes
The early USA aircraft premium pack rank 8 bad ?
In the future unknown next pre-order aircraft for USA after F-20A, but battle rating higher 12.7
British and france tech tree received Apache Guardian too
I might believe very good for aircraft 11.0 ~ 14.0 and higher
But bigger 128 km x 128 km ?
Why choose, when you can have both?
And yes, it works
8 Likes
That would defently boost the community trust overall and stop mad lads to thinking bias country bad and propaganda runs the snail
edited so it is more clear what i mean as I was meaning for the “GE returned” bit.
So on this, anyone able to say how many crates to get the "guaranteed to receive " “talismans and premium vehicles” when it comes to the returned GE? Does the returned GE mean that you have to buy more crates to get a different ranked premium vehicle given to you?
NGL leaves a bad taste in the mouth how its written, just feels weird.
eg, say I buy 14 crates, get a tank in a bracket I have them all for, and just get the GE returned, do I need to buy 14 more crates for another go at a vehicle under the Guaranteed" bit?
Dont need the new mexico we need newer bb
- Talisman for vehicles (15% chance but at least once for every 14 crate openings); breakdown of chance by vehicle rank:
- Premium vehicles including unavailable for sale (15% chance but not less than once for every 14 crate openings); breakdown of chances by vehicle ranks: