Hey i mean if its pointless its infuriating.
Are those… baktar shikan FnF?
Miraz05
March 21, 2025, 11:48pm
592
These are AR-1 missile(right) and AR-2 missile(left)
Spoiler
The suggestions in question if anyone was curious:
Air simulation battles has long had the same handful of objectives for players to partake in beyond being an EC team deathmatch. These objectives are paramount for a team to have a good chance of winning the battle, but have many glaring issues that are overdue for being corrected.
Objectives have no real impact on the general game-state beyond tickets.
Objectives barely interact with the players, and do so in questionable ways when they do.
Objectives are not roughly period appropriate in the…
Air simulation battles has long had the same handful of objectives for players to partake in beyond being an EC team deathmatch. These objectives are paramount for a team to have a good chance of winning the battle, but have many glaring issues that are overdue for being corrected.
Objectives have no real impact on the general game-state beyond tickets.
Objectives barely interact with the players, and do so in questionable ways when they do.
Objectives are not roughly period appropriate in the…
Air simulation battles has long had the same handful of objectives for players to partake in beyond being an EC team deathmatch. These objectives are paramount for a team to have a good chance of winning the battle, but have many glaring issues that are overdue for being corrected.
Objectives have no real impact on the general game-state beyond tickets.
Objectives barely interact with the players, and do so in questionable ways when they do.
Objectives are not roughly period appropriate…
Air simulation battles has long had the same handful of objectives for players to partake in beyond being an EC team deathmatch. These objectives are paramount for a team to have a good chance of winning the battle, but have many glaring issues that are overdue for being corrected.
Objectives have no real impact on the general game-state beyond tickets.
Objectives barely interact with the players, and do so in questionable ways when they do.
Objectives are not roughly period appropriate…
Air simulation battles has long had the same handful of objectives for players to partake in beyond being an EC team deathmatch. These objectives are paramount for a team to have a good chance of winning the battle, but have many glaring issues that are overdue for being corrected.
Objectives have no real impact on the general game-state beyond tickets.
Objectives barely interact with the players, and do so in questionable ways when they do.
Objectives are not roughly period appropriate…
4 Likes
Yeah, infuriating for the German players that would like to get something new, but get copy-paste instead
So nothing new huh?
Something, something Politics… something…
9 Likes
You just got the Eurofighter Typhoon and Panzerhaubitze 2000 in December. You can’t get special stuff every update unless your nations abbreviation starts with US.
3 Likes
TB-001 would be a unique drone for China
4 Likes
Its trump naming it after himself (47th president). Because we cant have anything nice.
4 Likes
F-47 Trumpcard vs Su-75 Checkmate
2 Likes
Rookie number of missiles :P
poll
[image]
Protector RG Mk 1
Welcome to my suggestion for the Protector RG Mk 1, a British variant of the MQ-9B Reaper, for the UK tech tree, to give it some spice.
History The UK’s history with the MQ-9 drone series began in January 2004 with RAF personnel joining 1115 Flight formed under the Combined Joint Predator Task Force, this embedded UK personnel in US Predator operations. RAF operations began in 2007 working from Creech Air Force Base, Nevada to fly drones over Afghanistan, with …
3 Likes
NCC105
March 22, 2025, 2:20am
603
TB-001 is a large thing, so why not larger
1 Like
I really was surprised Boeing got the contact rather than Lockheed.
1 Like
Probably bc F-35 outrageously expensive
Also, Boeing needs this. They cannot screw this up
Shay
March 22, 2025, 3:27am
607
Given the things going on with Boeing recently, the F-47 is not looking good.
鲁邦三世
March 22, 2025, 3:30am
608
F-47s are ugly, not as good looking as F-22s, those 6 generation planes are more like Ufos than planes
3 Likes
NCC105
March 22, 2025, 3:30am
609
Lockheed is busy enough dealing with F-35. and Boeing needs an order, they haven’t gets anything for a long time.
and given that strictly speaking Boeing haven’t developed any fighter since P-26(this is half a joke)
1 Like
