“The sky is blue”
“I agree”
“No, when I said the sky is blue I meant the sky is red why didn’t you understand”
I don’t believe I’m the problem in this conversation.
2 Likes
You’re currently on the place where Gaijin asks players to provide feedback for them to review.
1 Like
I’m sure.
There is no feedback here. All that you’ve stated is that they should add an IFV in the next update.
You haven’t given any basis to add an IFV on. Hell, it’s taken you 2 days to even name 1 IFV to be added. You haven’t given any information on them, you haven’t described why they should be added… You haven’t done anything.
What do you think my feedback is lol
I think they should add IFVs to minor nations this year. Specifically top tier IFVs on par with the Lynx at minimum.
I believe it’s a major issue that’s been neglected for too long and this year should be the year they fix it.
1 Like
Nothing? Hence why I said there isn’t feedback.
Then give them a reason to add vehicles on par with the Lynx. Give them vehicles that are on-par with the lynx. Tell them why it’s needed.
And no, saying “vehicles like the lynx” does not fit any of this. If you want an example of what I mean, look at
Or
Or even
Recommending a vehicle does NOT look like this
War Thunder’s nations should all be equally enjoyable to play.
1 Like
They would, it’s just the fact Sweden already has a lot of exceptions with vehicles, for example, the CV-90120, AHS, SAV20.12.48, T-80U, and Mi-28A. None of these entered service with Sweden, but are greatly appreciated, just as many other vehicles they trialed and tested.
They absolutely are, apart from those like Japan or Britain, where certain tiers require you to research every line.
1 Like
I think the point of this thread and the point trying to be made is this.
Those vehicles have been suggested. Several of them have been suggested for quite a long time
2019
2019
2019
2016
2021
To list but a few. Plenty more can be found:
But despite that fact, they still havent been added and several nations are woefully short when it comes to light tanks/IFVs at higher tier. Like Britain. All of these are exactly what we need right now and what we needed over the Challenger 3 or the Challenger 2 OES or maybe even the Challenger 2E.
To give a reason like you say:
Britain’s MBTs are niche, they are not built for mobility, and they have attempted to address that with the Challenger 2E and 3TD which have improved mobility. But another way to address the issues of the British Top Tier ground line-up is to add additional IFVs, vehicles on par with something like the KF-41, 2S38, etc. To give us a fast paced assault vehicle. Something useful for actually fighting in CQB and potentially enabling Britian to go for the objectives for a change.
Challenger 2 is getting a lot of attention recently, and whilst none of it is unfounded. There is a mountain of issues. The overall state of the British TT puts additional strain on the Challenger 2. As its forced to take on the roles that tanks like the Abrams or Leopard or T-80 simply dont. As those nations can call upon other vehicles instead
5 Likes
Subjective
Then how do you propose a solution to an entirely subjective point?
What is not subjective is the disparity between tech trees.
There are tech trees with full top tier lineups and those without. I wish for every tech tree in the game to have a full and complete lineup for all BR ratings, assuming there are vehicles to fill it.
In the case of the subject of this thread there are certainly IFVs to fill the mentioned gaps in tech trees.
How do you fix this? Take the time and develop IFVs for all nations that are worthy of >10.0 BR.
Well his is just not needed and their is plenty of ifv Britain can get past the warrior
Like what are you doing starting arguments over nothing
Alot nations lack a top tier ifv that they can get so they should get it ASAP
Woah what a point
2 Likes
Excluding Italy as well, as for now it has multiple IFVs already, the focus should be on MBTs for this nation)
1 Like
Italy needs SPAA lol
Spaa as well, but not that much. I mean it needs a top tier SAM for sure, but I feel a lack of MBTs (especially with armor) throughout brs way more.
my suggestion for the scorp 90 doesnt really carry over to the minor nations, as the British demonstrator version had all the features, most of which were not included in the export ones, also the fact that there are three different scorpion 90s, with only one being based on my suggestion (Alvis), there is also one from BAE and another from the guys who did the scorp 2000
It absolutely is. I’ve quite literally given you the profound additions to every tree in the game, all in the last 6 months.
But if there’s such a division, pray tell.
America has a full 11.3-11.7 lineup
Germany has a full 11.7 lineup
Russia has a somewhat varying but full 11.3-11.7 lineup
Britain has a full 11.3-11.7 lineup
Japan has an 11.0-11.7 lineup
China has a full 11.7 lineup
Italy has a full 11.3-11.7 lineup
France has a full 11.7 lineup
Sweden has the fullest of 11.7 lineups.
Israel has an 11.3-11.7 lineup.
But please, I’m sure half of these are most definitely lacking
4 high tier strike aircraft (America)
4 DM53 capable tanks with the best turret armor of MBTs (Germany)
Unbelievable all around applique coverage with the best helicopters (Russia)
A literal spamfest of top tier MBTs and GBU capable aircraft (Britain)
5 tanks with 4 second reloads, + made up F-16 for the gits and shiggles (Japan)
Best AA in the game, + better WP pattern tanks for the legacy 99, and a better Russian tank in the 99A (China)
Best harrier in the game with a myriad of M322 / DM53 firing tanks, as well as 5 top contending IFVs (Italy)
France with 4 Gen 4[+] aircraft, FAF helicopter, and 4 recently buffed MBTs (fremch)
Or how about everything in the game? Do you like that too? (Sweden)
Or again, multiple F-16s, an F-15, and a shitload of M322 and M338 on some fatass tanks (Israel)
America has their best IFV, save for a quality of life variant, at 10.0
Germany has an IFV that’s barely in service at 10.0, though people bitch about the lack of ATGMs that have piss poor performance to begin with.
Russia already has their best tracked IFV at 10.0, and the wheeled BTR-90 is effectively this but worse
Britain barely has any IFVs to begin with, and I’ve already told you what to do about their “others”
Japan has their best (albeit 40 year old) IFV in-game, and that doesn’t even qualify past 9.7.
Chinese IFVs have already been passed, not like they have any good ones.
Italian IFVs… Yeah, we already have 7. I think we’re good there.
French IFVs don’t qualify past 10.0, much like Japan. Their best has nothing but a 30mm Bushmaster and a CROWS.
5 Swedish IFVs is enough.
Already told you what to do about Israeli IFVs.
They’ve already put in time for IFVs. If you want more, you present more and a reason to add more. Israel has 8 Merkavas, 14 Magachs, 2 M163s, and a Shilka. Oh, yeah, forgot the TOW M113. What makes you think another less-armored Merkava will suffice? I can get behind the Eitan, though that’s just another copy/paste wheeled vehicle of the 21st century with 1 reverse gear.