I think the LG-1 gun has a future in game with infantry it looks like it can be pushed around and be easily set up plus the emergency ability for line of site fire. Could use it a a push gun of sorts if Gaijin wants that kind of thing.
Would be funny to have fortified a building in infantry mode and someone setting this up outside as a siege gun.
After years compiling Indonesian sub TT vehicle, i’m surprised no one try to make how Indonesian sub TT look like in JP TT, both Ground and Aircraft.
Haven’t touched ground yet, but air. Also note that ** xyz ** are hypothetical and * xyz * ordered but not delivered.
Indonesia is going to have a lot of modified for Indonesia, trialed, Asian Financial Crisis, Cancelled. Still its enough for a post.
Harimau MT got passed to the devs!
for aircraft there’s this:
On that note, what’s Harimau max reverse speed? Definitely not 5 km/h right? Lol
not stated, but it uses the Allison/Caterpillar X300 full automatic transmission with 4x forwards & 2 reverse, so its mostly going to be close to the CV90 series at ~30-40 kph
oh, it’s good then
Ho-RI gonna be removed soon, so for replacement do you people think PT-76(M) could replace it for 7.3 ?
The already implemented Type 75 & Type 99s are its replacement
but in terms of what Indonesia can uniquely offer at around that BR would be:
PT-76(M) | as youve mentioned (6.7 - 7.0)
SBS MLRS | (6.7 - 7.0)
Anoa PK20 | if given APDS belt (7.7)
Anoa/Badak FSVs | if it doesnt get APFSDS (7.3)
not including the AMX variants since they would be at around 8.0 (like the DF105)
but in terms of its role (armored SPG capable of taking hits and giving them) there’s not really much alternatives. Because of that Id prefer the Ho-ri be reworked into its more realistic form
PT-76(M) most likely sit in 7.3 like Italian C13 T90
Badak most likely get higher BR with APFSDS
its hull is worse than the C13 though. slightly worse armor, worse engine power, worse top-speed, plus it doesnt have that big void area in the rear. Its fair to put it at a lower BR especially considering the AUBL 74 also uses the same cannon and its much lower in BR (6.7)
for the Anoa/badak i think its better to separate it into two separate year with the early model prototypes of anoas not having apfsds and the proper Badak & scorpion having them, because otherwise it would just be 5 vehicles which are going to be the exact same thing
for the Anoa/badak i think its better to separate it into two separate year with the early model prototypes of anoas not having apfsds
this is what i fear the most, Gaijin probably doesn’t bother make 2 separate model for 2 differrent BR
Your first source here suggests that the CPWS turret is a mockup
good catch, dunno how i missed that tbh (maybe a relic of the old gdoc list whoops)
The vehicle looks to real to have mock up
Might be a partial mockup where the real turret is fitted but not with functioning weapons or sights like the Pandur FSV. That would still generally be a partial prototype and enough for the game.
Then again I can only find images of the CPWS in one fixed position, so it could just be completely non-functional.
UPDATE (02/08/2026)
Update V17
- Removed the Komodo CPWS (only a mockup turret)
- Changed the name of the British Morris C8 to the Canadian CMP FAT
Ive decided to have a go at this for the ground vehicles. ID vehicles is marked with the square white border, not all vehicles are included obviously, but this should give a rough idea on what it could look like
of course this is with only Indonesia, but there’s already a full ASEAN tree suggestion as well as the JP megatree list
