The Patriot will cover the sky within a radius of 60-70 kilometers, this is a medium-range air defense. Moreover, it also cannot work autonomously as one machine, a separate guidance station, a separate radar, and so on are needed. It is impossible for the United States to provide air defense better than adats, because they did not have adequate short-range air defenses anymore. There are interesting options only for Israel,italy, japan or come up with some new missiles for the flaracrad and ito 90. That’s it. I think in these circumstances, it is reasonable not to add air defense to NATO countries, but to drastically lower the points for aviation with only anti-aircraft weapons. A conditional f16 with an aim of 120 should cost 200-300 points, no more. If the ribbon on the gun is not armor-piercing.
I am completely aware of that + who said that it has to be controlled by the player? Gaijin has shown a keen interest in adding very modern weaponry. You know how to counter that? Definitely not with the SPAAs we have rn, aside from you know, shooting the missile. Will be fun once we get stealth missiles / missiles with countermeasures
- SLAMRAAM - 16km AIM-120A/C, 15-16km AIM-9X Block II, fired in maddog mode
- SLAMRAAM-ER - 15-16km AIM-9X Block II, 40km SLAMRAAM-ER (AIM-120C with booster), fired in maddog mode
- LAVRAAM - 16km AIM-120A/C, 40km SLAMRAAM-ER (AIM-120C with booster), fired in maddog mode
- MSL - 15-16km AIM-9X Block II
- FMTV MML - 15-16km AIM-9X Block II, 10-15km Tamir Interceptor
- Liberty M-113 - 11km VT-1 (still better than the ADATS)
- HVSD/ADAMS - 12km Barak-1 (still better than the ADATS)
- XM44 FOG-M / EFOGM - 10km MIM-157 FOG, 15km YMGM-157B EFOGM
- Hisar A+ - 15km Hisar A+, Turkish subtree
- Hisar O - 25km Hisar O, Turkish subtree
- Hisar O+ - 40km Hisar O+, Turkish subtree
(Pretty much all of these were on the High Tier - Top Tier SPAA Mega List.)
It’s not reasonable unless Gaijin implements a system to research aircraft at your current tier without having to grind the rest of the air tree, as otherwise NATO players would need to grind twice as much just to get anything to combat CAS.
Dont you feel like there is some logical error in this statement of yours? Im not saying youre a bad player. Dont get me wrong please. Your starts are above average player in both arb and grb. I just cant understand how youre saying this:
But dont even have more then 1 K/D. I mean, its good but its definetely not “easy”. Also given how matchmaker works nowdays, youre barely facing pantsirs even in 1 of your 5 games.
“You actually do have experience in top tier CAS yet I’m going to ignore that for the sake of my argument, and dismissing your opinion by totally ignoring your point and instead going after how much experience you have instead of your argument”
He is stating that pantsir is easy to deal with. Im replying, pointing out the reasons he is thinking this way. Whats wrong about my words?
And I aslo like this:
He is not. That the whole point.