There’s an armour hole across pretty much the entirety of the turret front where they’ve decided not to model the applique so you can’t even resist a .50 cal at close range, I’m assuming that’s the cause atleast.
1 Like
Curious, is the struggle to get above 50kmh a thing even when spaded with the scimi 2? As I have seen CCs struggle to get above it too, and is that realistic with it?
AFAIK a full spartan was able to hit over 60-70kmh pretty handedly as a similar weight vehicle, so it seems odd a Scimi 2 cant get over 50 to me.
The Harrier GR7 performance isn’t even better than the Harrier T10 . Its RWR, engine, and even ordnance loadout are all roughly comparable. It’s only at 12.0 purely because of the AIM-9M. I would’ve thought it inappropriate for the Tornado GR4 to sit at 12.3, but now that ALARMs are available, things are different.And why are the thermal imaging pods on British Harriers not high-definition?
Yeah… They should be 1.5+ at least, but the TIALD uses the same thermal imager as the Chally 2s and that is modeled as Gen 2.
GRB… maybe. ARB though, makes no difference at all
Maybe in some future update we’ll get a reskinned GR7 with updated equipment, and it’ll probably require 400,000 RP to research. As for the Tornado GR.4 in ARB, Gaijin likely thinks its helmet-mounted sight paired with AIM-9Ms makes it overpowered. I suspect the devs haven’t actually flown the GR.4 themselves.
Yep, it will be called the Harrier GR9A.
- Mk107 Engine
- HMD
- TERMA
- Sniper Tpod (Gr7 could have it too, but Im guessing it will come with the GR9A)
- Paveway IV
- Brimstones
- 100% LERX
etc etc
Will probably also get missing Gr7 buffs like 6x AGM-65 or 6x AAM Loadout configurations
Could even get ASRAAM
Tornado SLE is the same BR, which is just a Tornado RET8 with IRCCM. Doesnt even get BOL.
So its just Tornado IDS + More than the standard amount of CMs + IRCCM = 12.3 for some reason