The XP-50 is an XF5F with a 20mm. That’s a 2.3 plane with a better gun, and it’s at 4.0.
Again, learn the most BASIC shit about the vehicles you’re talking about.
I didn’t say it has 4.3 performance, I said it performs worse than contemporary Yaks at the BR and has a 4.3 engine. It is outclassed by the M-107A lineage of Yak-9s in almost every way, whether it be firepower, energy and power, or maneuverability.
I was the person you made those 10 posts to. I’ve even quoted multiple of them in the dozens of comments I made to you, pointing out the backwards statements you keep spewing and denying.
Its blockx file? As said, it has a static elevation of -2dg and a depression of -4.5dg.
If anything it should be slightly lower than it is, with most figures I’ve seen stating a myriad of numbers from 5.5dg to 6.2dg.
You are a troll. You spoke negatively about using Thunkerskill’s statistics, and now you are using them as a basis of an argument. You just want a vehicle you use often and already do well with to be stronger for you.
You tried to use it to show something for the sake of an argument, not to show it’s a horrible basis for one. You tried to make comparisons using Thunderskill. Laughable.
That doesn’t change the fact that you used it as a basis of an argument, something you said people shouldn’t do. Also, if it didn’t work, then why did you use it for a comparison of your stats compared to someone elses?
Quoting something doesnt mean you agree with it. Such a horrible attempt to backpedal and shift the argument to your side. Just admit it, you said Thunderskill was inaccurate and shouldn’t be used and then used it to make a comparison.
So you disagree with Thunderskill’s accuracy, but agree with it because you quoted it. That makes sense to me. Quoting something doesn’t mean you agree with it, and you saying it does means nothing.