Why Russian NSVT mg not overheating?

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
41

Yeah, imagine nerfing random vehicles due to bug reports in Russian that don’t provide a source, leaving missing armaments from dozens of planes, leaving dozens of vehicles bug-riddled (that would otherwise be good tanks if they weren’t so broken).

Imagine adding only a handful of unique vehicles that aren’t given to 4 other nations in the span of multiple years.

Imagine making 90% of the additions to the game copy paste vehicles from the U.S tech tree, ruining its uniqueness.

Imagine half-assing every vehicle that’s added to the U.S.

But don’t worry, It’s 100% Germany that suffers because they only have four overpowered toptier Leopards : D

2 Likes
42

Abrams series of tanks are exclusive to US. This can’t be said for Leopards or T-series tanks.

They’ll copy whatever they can get their hands on.
M44 - US copy
Benelux Leopards - GER copy
Osa/Strela - RU copy

Chinese mid tier is basically mostly RU/US copy.
Sweden as a whole is mostly RU/UK/GER copy.
Israel is mostly RU/US copy.

By claiming 2A5 is OP you’ll also claim 11.7+ M1s are OP as well considering they’re on-par.

6 Likes
43

Huey
Cobra
P-51
F-104
P-47
F4U
F-8 Crusader
F-100D
F-15
F-16
F-4 Phantom
SB2C
B-17
F-5
F-86

M46
M26
M36
M47
M48
M44
M109
Stuart
M16
M19A1
M42

Yes, the American tech tree is super unique, and half of its vehicles (90% of the ones recently added) totally haven’t been going to to other tech trees.

It’s abit goofy of you to call objectively worse tanks on par XD

1 Like
44

Oh no! F-15C is Typhoon equivalent while being 0.3 BRs lower than it!
Clearly making the F-15C OP is anti-USA of Gaijin.

Abrams fire the best round in War Thunder with excellent turret armor!
Clearly anti-USA. /s

Abrams being 0.3 BR lower than the competition on average? Clearly anti-USA. /s

@Pangolin_Fan
All accepted bug/historical reports have sources.

2 Likes
46

We don’t have unique trees anymore, US isn’t anything special in that regard.

11.7 - 12.0 M1s definitely aren’t worse than 2A5.

47

Sarcasm flew right above your head buddy.

1 Like
48

2000 meters out of an L/44 cannon [60 degree plate as IRL]:
DM53- 662mm
M829A2- 682mm

1 Like
49

L/55 is in the game for years now.

50

Which is irrelevant to the ammo. When comparing ammo it’s to be out of the same length of barrel.
Source: Scientific Method.

2 Likes
51

Global military superpower exports equipment en masse to allies, experts baffled.

4 Likes
52
  1. What do those numbers mean?
  2. Why are you cherry picking the l/44?
  3. 2000 meter engagements don’t occur often, why are you only using that?
53

DM53 fired from L/55 is better than M829A2.
I’ll now stop discussing this with you, it’s going nowhere.

54

@realshatterisbad
Good to know you think all NATO member countries are cherry picking.
That post means I get to ignore your takes until you take NATO seriously.

@MotorolaCRO
Ah, so now you’re copying my statement that Leopard 2s use a better gun, a movement of goalposts.

1 Like
55

What? We are talking about in game. Taking the worse gun to compare is disingenuous.

Dude, I could care less about what NATO does irl. We are talking about IN GAME PERFORMANCE. In which dm53 fired from the l/55 cannon outperforms it in every way.

56

I’m glad that we agree DM53 fired from L/55 is the best round in the game.

1 Like
57

For your shooting pleasure.

58

@AlvisWisla why are you talking with them about leopard 2 gun in nsvt mg post lol

3 Likes
59

Well, most game devs don’t know a lot about firearms, why things work exactly. They have a basic understanding almost always.

Take for example: DayZ I love the game to death, but 5.56 does more damage than 7.62x39 when it shouldn’t…

60

me when I sell my everything to everybody and this ends up being represented in the virtual plane/tank game 20 years later

2 Likes
61

Didn’t see us mains talk about anything when their new toy rambo SPAA could fire 6000 rounds without stopping once lol

5 Likes