Why no Su27S flanker at 13.0 yet?

for a2a? yeah pretty much, assuming 1992 first AMRAAM kill standard

With TWS and AIM-9Ms (if everybody complaining about this change got their way, not you specifically) it would simply be superior to the 29SMT

a F-16D block 40 would make the FM difference closer if not give the SMT the advantage.

the D wouldnt have HMD too

I doubt that, even knowing not a lot about the F-16. The 29SMT is a lardass.

Well, F-16s with AMRAAMs are the necessary counter for MiG-29SMT at 13.3, so I don’t know what you mean.

F-16 ADF with AMRAAMs vs MiG-29SMT is a reasonably balanced matchup. AIM-120s are better at range, but R-77s are better at close range, thus against experienced players R-77 is better. 29SMT has HMS and ADF doesn’t. ADF has a much better flight model, but only AIM-9Ls, SMT has R-73s.

More things are in favor of 29SMT, but the flight model is so bad, that it’s pretty equal.

If they get AMRAAMs, they will also get TWS.

did APG-66v1 have TWS irl?

I bet Gaijin will give them a new radar.

fair enough. like panter said, i think a lot of the advantages and disadvantages will result in F-16 with AMRAAM and 9M being fairly equal to R-73, HMD, R27ER, R27ET and R77 MiG-29

British jets are over BRd , no contest compared with any other nation

Swifts, phantoms, hunters, tornados, vampire, sea hawks, jaguars. Just off top.of my head

that one is at right place

Only British phantom that should go down is the junk, thing has no business being at 12.0

Ew. My MiG-29smt has a 0% wr, and a negative kd. That thing is beyond terrible.

Su-27 is a much nicer plane by comparison.

I’d still take the 9m any day of the week, they’re just better in everything except g overload. Their irccm system works better, as gatewidth takes too long to engage, if it would be engaged on the rail, then they would be equal.

And given an sim environment, the 9M is just vastly superior.

AMRAAM is usually pretty good too, perhaps not equal to and R-27ER, but at the same rate, both nations didn’t use the same technologies.

It is no?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8k25bcmjZ9Wt

lol that’s not what I said, and that’s for magics

thats for all gatewidth missiles, it’s engaged on the rail

1 Like

As much as I wish that were true, it isn’t, gatewidth doesn’t shrink FOV on the rail. I have plenty of experience with R-73s to know this.

F4S = Slats, HMD, better fox1s

Not enough over the british for it to go 11.7?

British F-4 other than J(UK) are 11.3…

MB - didnt see “sim” tag.