All the aircraft I currently think should have BR drops, I would rather see get buffed up to IRL performance. The only one that should be lower is the Tonka GR1 (along with the ASSTA1 and IDS (1995) because gaijin is stupid)
Just Gaijin seems unwilling to actually apply any fixes.
In fact, Id actually advocate for BR increases with the right buffs/combo of buffs.
Yep, because you are advocating for crazy, insane buffs for Soviet vehicles every single post. Like Su-24 should have 4x R-73s at 11.3 or Su-39 should have R–77 at 12.0. You know what aircraft are perfect to compare to something like the Su-24? Tonka. do you want to know what aircraft is perfect to compare to the Su-39? SHar,
People have been asking for 13.3 bracket for months.Its not coming bud.
Also 13.3 bracket would just be blue side getting slammed. MiG-29 SMT, Su-34, and Jf-17 are going to be harder for things like F-15A etc to counter than just regular SARH Su-27.
Are you actually getting mad… because I make sense? The Su-24 has a hard time defending itself, and the vehicle that came out in the same update as it, the A-10C was an 11.0 to start out, where as the Su-24 was an 11.7 if I’m not mistaken.
US: F-14B, F-15A, F-18C, maybe something like the F-16D ish like Quartas suggested
Britain: Tornado F3 Late (especially if it gets buffed one of these days)
Israel: F-16D
vs
USSR: Mig-29SMT, Su-27, Su-34
Germany: F4F ICE
China: JF-17 and J-11A
With Japan, Italy, Sweden and France bouncing between the 2. Id still consider that far more balanced than having a few 13.3s fighting 14.0s and the rest of the 13.3 at 13.0.
Would be a lot better for future game health.
So what its not come yet. It took an entire year of fighting to get sensible brackets in 2023/2024. Advocating for making the game worse, just because they havent listened yet just seems stupid
It’s very unlikely they will anytime soon though. Especially for game mode that is barely played and has had population drop by 50 percent in past 3-4 months.
People unironically talk more about playing Sim than they do playing it.
Take morvran, I doubt he has touched it in the past month or two.
So does the Tornado Gr1 at 11.7. I guess it should get Aim-9Ms that it used in OP Granby
No. The Su-24 was at 11.3 and the A-10C was at 11.3 and rapidly moved to 11.7.
Also, arguing a supersonic should have better AAMs because a subsonic has better missiles is a recipe for chaos. Because by the same argument I could say the Jaguar Gr1A should have Aim-9Ls at 10.7 because the Su-25 has R-60M at 10.3. See how dumb of an argument that is?
But there is no direct is my point, especially in 100m MP which would make invulnerable to any radar missile.
And you somehow would get a hit, it would be because the missile proxied close enough to the point that the warhead actually managed to reach and hit the target plane
Amraam was the best because it was actually the best missile in the game, with the most range, some of the best maneuverability and it being fired from the best platforms
That is just your opinion
Due to gaijin’s poor decision making, and pretty much every other nation had something better than 27SM.
Only ever so slightly worse (lets not act like there’s a night and day difference between R77 and darter)
And at least on release, it was just 2 less fox-3’s (6 vs 4)
Let’t not forget that Su27SM also had an abysmal fm, a useless radar, and 10KM hmd.
Well, the US doesn’t have a 13.3 for ARB either so the F-16D could be added for that as well. If it matters to you, it’s a fairly historical plane too, a USAF F-16D block 40 was the first plane to get a kill with an AMRAAM. There is also the F-14D which is a pretty popular aircraft that could be 13.3 in sim
If fired down, it could still hit. I know i killed a few doing this, even back when it was 100m. Just it was deadly to climb in something with poor FM with the extreme compression we had.
It had the best range, but again, you only got kills because people just exclusively used MP. It never had the best maneuverability, in fact, its always had the worst. Sure the F-15C was OP, but that doesnt mean the AMRAAM was good on everything.
and lets not forget the Su-27SM has HMD and R-73s which is a powerful combo and Could still take R-27ET and R-27ER which remain powerful missiles even to this day.
The level of versatility the Su-27SM had was rather insane. It had the right missile for every situation. I saw plenty of Su-27s getting loads of kills even against F-15Cs and Gripen Cs .
Define “rapidly” because it took 2 months for that, after the damage was already severely done.
And it was originally 11.0 got bumped to 11.3 realized it was still way too good, and got bumped to 11.7
I typically compared it to the Su-25sm3 which was 12.3 for the longest time, while being worse in every aspect except the speed.
Mm putting words in my mouth now?
I said before if the Su-24 was allowed any R-73s, it would be limited to 2x which really isn’t all that crazy, because if you’ve ever flown it. (you haven’t) you’d know it’s not good. Which is sad given you have 6 times the amount of sim games than I do.
Lmao I find it really funny you really remember all my quotes, you must despise the fact I make sense often.