Why is 2C38 on 10.3?

[Beeschurger]

@Константинович7

if the 2S38 is so good as people claims (the same people that doesn’t have 2S38) then play it, take a few matches and share the Kill/Death ratio then you can start a decent discussion about the subject.

Until then this is most a cope thread trap to push a nonsense discussion until it’s locked

@Константинович7

Strv 122, Strv 122B+, Strv 122B PLSS, Leopard 2A7V, Leopard 2A7HU, are all far superior over the T-80BVM and T-90M

@Константинович7

I’ll do as you coping about this specific statement I did: Ohh boo hoo Leopard 2A7V got nerfed, so why don’t you use the other three Leopard 2 on the tech tree. Why not? They aren’t Meta? Aren’t they a hold W like the Leopard 2A7V Roadrolling everything that it sees ahead?

strange, for someone who thinks that you cant really speak about vehicle unless you played it, you comment about 2A7Vs despite not playing them.

Curious, if i dare to say :)

[noamax]

Ok so dont come here in claims

[MrBombastic8]

Never!

[Beeschurger]

@Sternlos

Stat shamimg beyond just seeing if someone plays those brs or vehicle is retarded because its just a way to avoid arguements.

well there are scenarios where stat checking (or “shaming” if you want to call it that) is more than enough.

if theres someone claiming that F-4J/S is terrible plane and needs to go down to 11.0 BR, do you
A) engage in lengthy argument about its kit and how its best played
B) check his stats and see dude is 400 deaths to 20 kills and call him out on that?

[TIGER_TANK_1]

Because it’s slow for a light tank. In fact most MBTs have a higher power to weight to it.

[Sternlos]

If his post is crap sure who cares but if hes outlining from his perspective why just tear those points apart.

For instance even in this thread we have this,

@Demokrat4

It is also important that hstv l does not penetrate the T-80 and T-90 in the side and in the gun mantlet. You can make a mistake shooting at the side of the T-80, this mistake will send you to the hangar.

I just reponded with a joke,

@Sternlos

I still need to research the stalinium breach cover and side skirts so I cant speak on this.

theres nothing to say to this because its just flat out wrong and theres no room for interpretation otherwise.

[Константинович7]

Indeed, I would too until Gaijin fixes the TOW-2B flying behaviour and real penetration values, until then is a situational weapon.

[Константинович7]

It’s indeed, but this has nothing to do with this discussion and I believe it’s just anger, going after a personal discussion rather than the topic in this thread.

[Apollo_1641]

The M3A3 Bradley is overtiered, in it’s current state it’s honestly 9.7 or 9.3 material.

It has poor mobility, a big silhouette, poor survivability, mediocre autocannon, and suffers from a missile launcher which cannot fire on the move and needs time to be made ready after stopping.

2S38 can destroy many opposition MBTs even from the front, while moving. The M3A3 cannot do the same. It’s not a good comparison

[Beeschurger]

@Константинович7

but this has nothing to do with this discussion

It has everything to do with this discussion.

You can dismiss topics by stating that if person have not played vehicle it cant talk about its performance and its just cope and at the same time talk about performance of vehicle that you havent played in different topic.

Bottom line, it makes you a hypocrite. And thats not even mentioning the probable ill will behind it.

[Flying_Scotsman]

its 10.3 because it makes gaijin a lot of money

[Demokrat4]

Why then is RDF/LT at 11.7?

[viski253]

how about lowering the HSTVL to 11.0