Mixed combat?? Dude, no one can defeat these guys came from last century with 10s’ tanks and jets
HSVT, M1A2S? They are just as fragile as toys to russian tanks, once penned on the weakness they are meant to die, while the ammo stored in T80s and T90s NOT explode even they turned to black on your right top on your screen!!!
And the leopards, the clowns of clowns, since gaijin changed the frontal armor, once penned, DIE.
BTW, where is my TECH-D or E on my leopard???
Seriously??? Are they any tanks better than russian MBTs?? NO!
For ground: LFP, Angled shots, turret ring, turret roof, all of them are weak spots, and if you hit the fuel tank it’s probably a kill due the high rate of destroying due fuel tank explosion.
Most of Western vehicles has the best mobility in the game, use it on your advantage.
Shoot the HSTV-L turret: nothing happens, the Gunner is on the chassis, M1A2 is good vehicle, maybe the issue is between the chair and the computer, it has good mobility, good reloading rate if you have Ace crew and you have the most number of CAS planes in the game,
T-90M is the best option for USSR in top tier while T-80BVM only has the mobility and the protection only is good on the front on very specific areas.
Leopard can hold three or two well placed shots, even in the UFP because the Gunner and Driver eats all the spalling leaving the loader and commander alive.
Strv 122, Strv 122B+, Strv 122B PLSS, Leopard 2A7V, Leopard 2A7HU, CV 90120, Lvkv 9040C, HSTV-L, Leopard 2A6, ZTZ 99A, VT4-A1, Centauro I 120, Type 90, TKX (P), TKX and Type 10 MBT, Challender 2 BN, Challenger 3 TD, Leclerc SXXI and Leclerc AZUR are all far superior over the T-80BVM and T-90M that are the only USSR MBTs on top tier.
T-90M is the only tank that’s in the top 10 MBTs in War Thunder, and that’s by combining Strv 122s and M1A2 SEP with the others.
2S38 is a standard 10.0 that Sweden had for much longer.
Dude, maybe I am a little emotional cuz of rounds after rounds killed in any ridiculous angers, shot down by panstirs, defeated which may lead me to be like this.
Would you look at that, M1A2 is identical to the T-72B3 and T-80U in performance which gives me a strong indication all 3 are BR’d correctly in relation to each other.
Cross-analysis of capabilities further proves they’re BR’d correctly.
And win rate? I had team mates with more skill on average when playing T-80U and T-72B3, that is all win rate will ever prove.
And I almost never bring SPAA or CAS when playing the Soviets…
Edit: I looked at your stats and your USA stats is similar to your Soviet and Swedish stats.
Don’t u feel that 1 out of 3 russian players are noobs and 2 out of 3 USA players are???
The main issue is, once M1A2s taken damage, they lost ability to fight back, as for T80s or T90s? There is a great possibility to surivive and kill their enemies, Abrams are just junks in War Thunder so that the snail made them a fire rate of 5 rounds/S.
Survivability onion makes you a better player:
Don’t be seen.
If seen don’t be shot at.
If shot at don’t be hit.
If hit don’t be penned.
If penned don’t be destroyed.
Worrying about the final 2 means you’re not trying to do the first three.
I don’t and won’t belittle people for their stats.
So if YOU feel like your performance in War Thunder isn’t to your personal goal, adopt the survivability onion into your playstyle.
However, your performance is consistent among MBTs currently regardless of which tech tree you’re playing, and that is something that is admirable.
Congrats on being consistent, as consistency is hard to manage.
