Software develop a way to get better at the game.
But all jokes aside. How are you negative on the F-14A IRIAF? Even I have positive KD in it
From FAQ, it weighs 60% PLAYER KILL per SPAWN and 40% win rate against other players using the same vehicle (I do wish it was kill/death instead for air sim as there’s a bunch of sessions you join thinking there’s people to fight only to give up, land and go next as you cannot find anyone to fight).
Low numbers can also cause statistical weirdness, so that probably contributes as you only played very few RB games in it.
But also: Rank 1 plane will also skew things being something.
Like, you have 6 player kills for 7 spawns in a rank 1 bomber (Kill per spawn at 0.85). Consider the average new, rank 1 player who jumps into a bomber and likely expects the automatic a.i tail gunners to do the job and may not even realize they can swap to them.
The only reason people like you doing it is Gaijin in their wisdom thinking it’s a good idea to create a gamemode and putting a reward system on it, that is totally the opposite to the goal of the battle: The action with no effect to the battle creates the highest reward.
This forces people to an egoistic playstyle instead of playing team.
2 Likes
I really hopes base bombers also can make some efforts for winning.
But Gaijin is too lazy for
- Make strategic bomber/low alt interdictor useful
- fix their game
So this shitstorm happens.
Well… OP dislikes ‘real bombers’ like us
Because we are ineffective in ARB. :/
Unlike his fighter does.
1 Like
While I agree that this guy is bad at this game, he is as bad for the team as you playing your tornado ids that brings nothing for the team, he is a handicap, just like every single tornado player
This is what I feel disappointed most.
Also, hurts quite a lot. With a bit of annoyance as extra.
Gaijin is too lazy to fix ARB and makes low-alt interdictor useful
And letting me tied with the ‘same useless handicap’ kind of player like him. :/
Unlike OP, I am trying to dogfight in Tornado or F-111 when the team is filled with a bunch of MiG-23ML. (They will steal a base with ZB500 anyway, so carrying bombs will easily become useless dead weight)
But thanks to flight characteristic differences, the Interdictor can’t make a good effort in A2A, unlike fighter jets.
And Sadly, I can do nothing but accept your blaming. ‘You are also a useless handicap to a team like him.’
:'(
Yeah… your claim is right…
Playing Tornado IDS nowadays is nothing but being the dead weight of the team…
Base bomber which can’t bomb base.
Interdictor which can’t penetrate behind enemy lines.
Attack Aircraft, which is forced to go A2A instead and ends up with a mediocre fighter.
Just in the same fate as Heavy bombers like Lancaster or B-17 does.
Still, bombing bombers or attackers in the intended role should weigh differently compared to
Fighter which disposes missiles and bombs the base instead.
1 Like
What the bean bags is this thread? Do NOT bomb in fighters, it is the most atrocious and scummiest way to play this game. You hang dedicated strike aircraft out to dry just because you can’t play this game.
1 Like
what am i supose to do in stock F-4C then? its awful
they put napalm on the fighters for a reason
1 Like
Deal with it? It’s just gone back down in BR too. It’s perfectly fine at it’s current BR. Stock grinding is always bad and is on every aircraft.
Except for on dedicated strike aircraft. What are THEY meant to do stock grinding when they can’t get to bases and when their air to air capability is sometimes completely null or barely even a cannon?
‘Forced’ dogfight just like Tornado or Vark doing nowadays maybe…? :|
I think i am somewhat acceptable to multirole jets.
(Both F-105 and F-4C striked vietnam. Right?)
But also thinks ‘Strappin bomb in J-7D/F-8E’ of OP sounds bit annoying.
i have better KD on A-10A late (got it recently) than F-4C. and most of my kills were from guns too, ppl flare the 9L really easily. in F-105D, i could outrun most jets and now that its 10.0 (could be 9.7 tbh) it doesnt have to race tornados, and F-105D, even with no flares, has good gun.
might do this since it doesnt take up any missile slots. and would supplement earnings
and yeah, US F-4, F-105, and F-100 all striked stuff in vietnam.
I base bomb in P-51
(This is a joke, please do not impale me)
1 Like
Well no wonder, it can turn better, has better missiles, has flares, is at a higher BR. Of course a flareless plane in a tricky BR rating is going to be a challenge to play. The F-4C is hard to balance because it’s fast, it has lots of missiles, it has radar missiles, but also has no flares and a bad radar. It is GOING to be a challenge.
they really really suck though. it should get base AIM-7E, an AN/AAQ-8 IRCM
Impale him!!!
1 Like
So you move it up to 10.7 where it faces MiG-23ML and MLD, then you complain again when you get smited from every all aspect missile in existance and beg for it to be put down again.
or leave it at 10.0 with AIM-7E and AAQ-8\
maybe only AAQ-8 for 10.0