Why does mica get a better seeker than all the other ARH missiles?

Kinda amazing that there wasn’t threads or thinkpieces on how the R-27ER had much better seeker than all other SARH missiles despite having no disadvantage like how the MICA has a range disadvantage.

download (4)

4 Likes

Maybe it’s because Aim-7F doesn’t have data link and gnss.

I don’t see you comparing when russians had R-3R Vs Aim-7Es

1 Like

People have been complaining about r27er even before it got buffed

6 Likes

Mig-29 was also a horrible plane, with garbage-60Ms and butchered FM

Unlike rafale with great everything

And MICA’s seeker fov is realistic as well, only other missile that has something reported for it is the AIM-120s.

Yes there were posts here and there, but I haven’t seen it to the same level of extent that you see multiple threads being created about it.

Yeah no, there are many many more

5 Likes

And these are the ones on the new forum, the 27er released while we were still on the old forums so I’d bet a lot more complaints existed there as well

3 Likes

I get the point you’re making, but the third and fourth thread is not about how the R-27ER is OP or anything like that, but about how the R-27ER is at their current BR on certain aircraft, and in some instances replacing them with R-73s. It is more about the BR and historical accuracy (replacing R-27ER with R-73) than the weapon itself.

Why does mica get a better seeker than all the other ARH missiles? - Machinery of War Discussion / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum

MICA is practically undefeatable in most scenarios - Machinery of War Discussion / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum

Mica EM is too op, R77 is too bad - Machinery of War Discussion / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum

MICA-EM needs nerfed - Machinery of War Discussion / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum

Nerf MICAs - Machinery of War Discussion / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum

I’m sure being the best ARH within 20km wasn’t enough right?

1 Like

likely cause it has abysmal range

It doesn’t, especially when you consider the rafale is extremely fast and ARH missiles adopt the energy state of their launch platform. It has good enough range for BVR and is just strictly better than everything else within its NEZ which is still plenty large

1 Like

Aside that y’know, Rafale is artificially limited in speed on account of a RAM coating that isn’t modeled. It also doesn’t have good enough range for BVR, as against the platforms MICA faces it runs out of a chance of hitting the target past 15km.

Which is becoming a significantly more common engagement range with the current r77-1 implementation.

1 Like

Please. I’ve hit MICA shots at 35-40km before. The Rafale can go 2000kph at altitude very easy and BVR working at all is fully dependent on the other guy being asleep or not knowing how to notch in the first place. The MICA didn’t deserve to have a unique seeker. It was and would have been the best ARH regardless of this buff.

2 Likes

ive never gotten killed by rafale in bvr.

Good for you. Relevance?

1 Like

ive hit shots ay 40km with R-77 doesnt mean its somehow a bvr capable missile tho

If the target dies to an amraam they will likely die to a MICA. “BVR” in WT is purely a skill check to see if the other guy understands what notching is. If they do, sure, they won’t die to a MICA. They also won’t die to a R-77-1, or AMRAAM B/C.

1 Like

unless the guy is holding datalink. in which case a mica will just miss.

not like that matters really when one is just strictly worse than the other