Why do CAS players so vocally oppose any suggestions

Good that the majority of players is not even on the forum.

Go ahead please

You don’t really understand how polls work, right?

Oh it tells the whole story.

Again, please remember next time:
“The amusing part is that it would only affect que times if it was popular. So You can’t really say in the same comment that it is not popular and that it will affect que times”

1 Like

When I played my first game there was no Sweden, Israel or Naval. So you say the game cannot move on?

The OP asked why people like you are such ass holes about a separate GRB game so now you can answer.You came stomping in with your angry bad attitude so you tell me why Gaijin after 12 years cannot give big sections of the player base what they have asked for for a long time.

3 Likes

I agree. CAS shouldn’t be removed since it adds more dynamics to a battle, and it can be useful. I do however, think that SPAA is very underpowered, and that CAS is too good currently.

You want to be more specific since you didn’t find anything to shittalk ?

I found everything I predicted really.

1 Like

Which was im not doing so bad in tanks after all and still enjoy cas.

Can I get a response to this and why it would not be viable?

tldr:

  1. Put airfields farther away so that it takes 3-5 minutes for a full cycle of drop bomb, RTB, rearm, return over the current ~90 seconds.
  2. Increase spawn cost of using air-to-ground weaponry, and do so with respect for the BR (in other words: spawn cost of payload size and unguided weapons goes down the higher you go as they lose effectiveness).
  3. Give each nation viable SPAA for each 1.0 BR bracket.

Am I trying to turn WT into WoT?

If You want to think so, then ok ;)

If you want to shittalk someone for stats maybe check first next time. It’s ok bro.

I’m not shittalking anyone.

I’m just pointing out that players who want the current state of things to remain the same to have similarities and You are another example of it.

I know that playing without unbalanced mechanics would be hard for some, but really getting better at ground vs ground combat is not that hard

4 Likes

KD with one plane means nothing, maybe it was really op, or you played with it when the HVAR was so op.

Maybe you are good, but you can be sure you represent a minority. Because all the guys I see here asking to remove CAS are either bad or don’t play with planes or helicopters

1 Like

Hi, I play planes a lot, ideally in sim if the brackets and lobbies allow. I want them to actually be balanced in GRB in terms of:

  1. Put airfields farther away so that it takes 3-5 minutes for a full cycle of drop bomb, RTB, rearm, return over the current ~90 seconds.
  2. Increase spawn cost of using air-to-ground weaponry, and do so with respect for the BR (in other words: spawn cost of payload size and unguided weapons goes down the higher you go as they lose effectiveness).
  3. Give each nation viable SPAA for each 1.0 BR bracket.

You mean before rocket nerf?

I have played it recently. You can find even traces of it in this topic.

3 Likes

Because they are bad at the game and need ground players who can’t defend themselves to bully

2 Likes

Man, you’ve played this game for like 30 hours and you’re trying to change the game for your benefit

How the hell have I played the game for “30 hours” when

image

I have 40 hours just in sim.

image

100 hours in ARB

image

150 in GRB.

I have ~150 hours flying planes and playing tanks equally.

Where have you even got the assumption of “30 hours”?

3 Likes

Play the game, don’t play the game,

Whatever you decide stop whining about it.

It is not your call.

8 days is the same thing. you are lvl 37

So why would it bother you so much if Gaijin made a TO GRB mode tomorrow?

You can still do what you always do in the old GRB

1 Like