Which is exactly what has been whined for forever.
if you think the naval mode is like world of warships, for better or worse, you are beyond help.
No it hasn’t ,get your facts right. The removal of CAS is what has been asked for and mostly by those who dont fly.
A new mode of GRB with no CAS is another issue entirely and it does not effect those who like combined arms one bit so bitch somewhere else please.
You tired old arguments don’t apply here.
3 Likes
I’m able of having 5 K/D in F4U-4B used only in GRB and I would prefer tank vs tank.
4 Likes
No it has not, go look yourself, im not gonna do the work for you.
Also the exact moment you played your first game you knew it was combined arms.
Gajin will not change that because of you and a few others, because it would increase queue times.
Good that the majority of people on this forum would like to have TO as polls showed that.
Should I look at Your in game profile and see how well You do in tanks?
The amusing part is that it would only affect que times if it was popular. So You can’t really say in the same comment that it is not popular and that it will affect que times
1 Like
I fly planes. I want less planes in GRB. I want to achieve this with significantly longer rearm/travel times to encourage usage of large and clumsy planes over fast and capable fighters if you want less downtime between bomb drops, and I want to achieve this by increasing the spawn cost of air-to-ground ordnance in a way that scales with BR (a 250 lbs bomb at BR 3 is much more powerful than at BR 6, a 1000 lbs dumb bomb is way more powerful at BR 6 than versus a composite-armour high mobility MBT).
I also want functional SPAA at every 1.0 BR step. Britain has to use the 5.3 bosvark or skink for the entire 5.3-8.0 ranges. It really quickly falls off in effectiveness once jets are introduced.
If I want to fly planes, I got ARB/ASB.
2 Likes
Good that the majority of players is not even on the forum.
Go ahead please
You don’t really understand how polls work, right?
Oh it tells the whole story.
Again, please remember next time:
“The amusing part is that it would only affect que times if it was popular. So You can’t really say in the same comment that it is not popular and that it will affect que times”
1 Like
When I played my first game there was no Sweden, Israel or Naval. So you say the game cannot move on?
The OP asked why people like you are such ass holes about a separate GRB game so now you can answer.You came stomping in with your angry bad attitude so you tell me why Gaijin after 12 years cannot give big sections of the player base what they have asked for for a long time.
3 Likes
I agree. CAS shouldn’t be removed since it adds more dynamics to a battle, and it can be useful. I do however, think that SPAA is very underpowered, and that CAS is too good currently.
You want to be more specific since you didn’t find anything to shittalk ?
I found everything I predicted really.
1 Like
Which was im not doing so bad in tanks after all and still enjoy cas.
Can I get a response to this and why it would not be viable?
tldr:
- Put airfields farther away so that it takes 3-5 minutes for a full cycle of drop bomb, RTB, rearm, return over the current ~90 seconds.
- Increase spawn cost of using air-to-ground weaponry, and do so with respect for the BR (in other words: spawn cost of payload size and unguided weapons goes down the higher you go as they lose effectiveness).
- Give each nation viable SPAA for each 1.0 BR bracket.
Am I trying to turn WT into WoT?
If You want to think so, then ok ;)
If you want to shittalk someone for stats maybe check first next time. It’s ok bro.
I’m not shittalking anyone.
I’m just pointing out that players who want the current state of things to remain the same to have similarities and You are another example of it.
I know that playing without unbalanced mechanics would be hard for some, but really getting better at ground vs ground combat is not that hard
4 Likes
KD with one plane means nothing, maybe it was really op, or you played with it when the HVAR was so op.
Maybe you are good, but you can be sure you represent a minority. Because all the guys I see here asking to remove CAS are either bad or don’t play with planes or helicopters
1 Like
Hi, I play planes a lot, ideally in sim if the brackets and lobbies allow. I want them to actually be balanced in GRB in terms of:
- Put airfields farther away so that it takes 3-5 minutes for a full cycle of drop bomb, RTB, rearm, return over the current ~90 seconds.
- Increase spawn cost of using air-to-ground weaponry, and do so with respect for the BR (in other words: spawn cost of payload size and unguided weapons goes down the higher you go as they lose effectiveness).
- Give each nation viable SPAA for each 1.0 BR bracket.
You mean before rocket nerf?
I have played it recently. You can find even traces of it in this topic.
3 Likes