Merkava, other tanks and planes are just modernized nato and ussr tanks and planes(just like in the Ukraine with oplot and others)
1 Like
Okay, since this is a modification, can you tell me the base of the NATO tank on which it is built???
Ukraine oplot is t80 mod, Merkava is ???
Oplot have the same hull as T-80, everything other is new
2 Likes
they already put Taiwan to China
1 Like
they used the hull as a demonstrator, Merkava and centurion have nothing alike
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Ukraine sub tree in the British, US, Japan, Sweden, French tech tree is ok, but not in ussr
There are quite a few vehicles I would argue are definitely are quite unique for example Donets, Shershen, AB-13, BTR-3s/4s/94, Rokach, Azovets, BMPT Strazh, BMP-64, HMMWV with R/73s , R-149 MA1 with a Brm 1k turret, HEMUS-2020 BMP 2M, HEMUS-2020 MT-LB, Kevlar E, Otaman 3, VAB MK.3 with the Sich module, Buk with sea sparrows, MT-LBu with B-8s, Scorpion Kasket, and Mbombe 6x6 (Spys-Syntez). Not to mention the other T-64/72/80/84 variants and several AA trucks which only Ukraine made.
I guess it also depends your view on if ERA (and shrapnel protection for SAMs) is a significant change because you can then include the modified donated Leopards, Abrams, Patriot, Bradley and IRST.
5 Likes
T-84 gets a 2026 update
5 Likes
Give Ukrainian tanks to Japan tech tree we love Ukraine ❤️❤️❤️
1 Like
from Russia’s one border to another
No? In my opinion the US has hundreds of vehicles and dozens of lineups which are worth it to play, where no other nation IRL or in game could make comparable lineups.
You can’t point at a couple export vehicles which the exporter nation doesn’t even use as a reason to make the nation worthless to play. The US only has a somewhat lacking 12.3 and higher experience, but 12.0 and below all have great or very competitive lineups for Ground Battles.
In Air battles the US has always been top 2 since 2013.
6 Likes
From a ground stand point i would disagree, its the embodiment of mid for everything. For example the F16 arguably up there to be one of the most iconic US vehicles of all time. The US in game had to wait a full year to get MAW pods on any F16 but the French get the very same MAW pods used by the US a year early. In reality all BLK 50/52s should be able to carry it but now they cherry pick to make money. Another great example being the cas loadouts, the US has the GBU 53 which is the US version of the spice carried on every top tier US vehicle yet we don’t see it in game. This isn’t the first time its happened, the EF had access to GBU 3s almost a full year before the US and then gaijin markets the update as “ALL NEW CAS ORIDINACE!!!” when in reality its copy paste. Another great example is the AH64E, the only ones able to carry the JAGM should be the Dutch and UK 64s along with the US, yet in game every nation gets DCIRM it could never use due to the aircraft limitations and JAGMs that were never fitted. Why? Because the US in game stands for one sole reason and that’s to make smaller nations playable, The US TT is nothing but a door mat for most players because you can get the same thing in a different country. Want and Abrams? Play the most modern variant in China, Want a F15? Play israel with a better cas loadout, Want a Sherman? play literally every other nation.
The US isnt the only one facing this problem, Germany is second in this issue with lack of there leopards and lack of KF41.
DAF YA-4442 truck equipped with ZU-23-2 AA gun
3 Likes
This is the best option. Japan can already receive five Ukrainian vehicles with minimum controversy
And even one polish tank
Japan only will get Thai and probably Indonesian exports from Ukraine but not Ukraine themselves.
1 Like
2 Likes