Topic about Japan adds T-84 and VT-4

Forget it, Thailand is a Japanese sub tree. The VT-4 is bound for the tree.

5 Likes

I agree with your point, and I stand by my second argument mentioned earlier. Either they don’t release it as you suggested, or it should go to China instead of Japan.

There is quite frankly 0% chance of it coming to china.

5 Likes

I’ve made myself perfectly clear—this is the fundamental disagreement. Why are you still being so obstinate? There’s no such thing as “delaying its release.” The only options are either not adding it at all or giving it to China, not Japan. Can’t you understand what I’m saying?

Gaijin, I’ve recently seen a lot of ads for War Thunder on the Chinese video site Bilibili. We can see you’re paying attention to the Chinese market. But did you ever consider the reaction on Chinese forums, Tieba, and video sites if you gave the Thai VT-4 tank to Japan? Is this how you plan to destroy your investment? Honestly, if you do this, I even doubt whether streaming this game will be allowed in China anymore, or if content creators will be able to make videos about War Thunder. There are plenty of games out there; not having this one really wouldn’t make much difference. If you think it’s no big deal, then I guess that’s okay.

6 Likes

You have your opinion, I have mine. I am not being obstinate, this is a compromise. Please go check this really good suggestion if you are interested.

Dear Administrator,

In that case, we’ll proceed with the first option: not introducing this vehicle for the Thai Army—neither now nor in the future.

1 Like

How do you feel about ROC Abrams?

I’m not an administrator. Moderation doesn’t actually work for gaijin.

Me saying it has a 0% chance isn’t from any internal plans, it’s simply how it is, gaijin wouldn’t add a vehicle from one STT into another nation, especially when said other nation already has versions of the same vehicle.

Must be nice to just pick and choose huh

1 Like

I could see them adding an otherwise identical but non Thai VT-4 to China

I understand your point, which is why I also suggested it’s best to halt development on this—to avoid unnecessary disputes.

Given gaijin’s development cycle of over a year, the VT-4 for thailand is more then likely already done, or if not nearly done. And it’s unlikely they’ll scrap something they already paid to develop.

But it is a Sovereign state wdym? The civil war started between both ROC and PROC.
Both are sovereign states.

4 Likes

What? You mean the ROC is a sovereign state? Go check how many sovereign nations currently maintain diplomatic relations with this so-called ‘country’? Do major powers like the U.S., Russia, or the EU recognize it now?

4 Likes

Please also refrain from discussing political content on this forum, as it has already crossed the line.

It’s just as sovereign as PROC, you won’t say USA and PROC doesn’t exists just because Bhutan doesn’t see it as an actual nation.

Alright

I know what you mean, I still think its just not the best thing to fight over. Much better things to fight over regarding this.

Also I really dont think Russian players would care about that.

Better example would include ukraine or poland

Alright enough politics, the other mods will be very displeased if they have to pay any more attention to this.