You still don’t understand that one piece of weaponry isn’t all that’s about a vehicle in it’s balancing and BR.
That’s like complaining other nations need full stabilization earlier because UK tanks have it as well.
Or complaining about other nations not receiving M829A1 equivalent at 10.0, but Sabra somehow do.
I guess asymmetrical balancing is hard to get around.
What if it doesnt move perfectly perpendicular to the flight path? Thats factor outside of attacking plane control and thus relies on luck rather than skill.
Sorry, i dont. I cant be bothered with any sort of squadron activity since i moved to WT from WoT 8 years ago.
Because it was a joke? There never was an IR Brimstone, not even proposed. In game it’d prolly just be the current Brimstone with a C&P Maverick-G seeker
true true we should remove all armour from soviet tanks but its fine because they still have autoloaders that most top tier tanks dont have thats just asymmetrical balancing, ooo ooo I know lets also remove R-77 and R-77-1s and replace them with R-27ERs after all they are the best SARH it would just be asymmetrical balancing
It is. At larger distances the angular adjustment to reaquire the SPAA will be smaller of course. I picked the worst case scenario.
Then the angular adjustment necessary to reacquire the SPAA will be smaller, making it easier for you to kill it.
No worries, it’s just a good example how vehicles can perform when they’re using their full potential. The Typhoon vs Pantsir battle happens pretty much every match there (in the week that top tier is played), so people optimize it to hell and back.
hey it meets the criteria of weapons apparently, we got images of the main body being fired and we have a mock up (its more then the KH-38MT since the seeker is actually attached to the missile)
honestly we should try to get the devs to add it if all we need is a mock up and proof that only a variant of the weapon has been test fired and integrated