Its likely they didnt realize it was fake. Info on the thing is sparse and as you can see from the comments, ppl that want it to be real have no issue misinterpretting or lying about what little info there is.
Even then, I cant say for 100% sure that it never existed, there is the possibility that there is a pic out there or a test doc or something that I have not found that proves me wrong, but until then, I think the evidence against its existence is overwhelming.
Companies advertised stuff that isn’t fully developed yet all the time. If people sign up as customers then it gets put into full development and production, if they don’t it quietly dies. For example the Typhoon (ASRAAM with a HEAT warhead for use against tanks) got advertised at trade shows and then faded into obscurity when no one ordered it:
No one takes real rockets to the exhibition.Real missiles can only be in a military base.And since this is an exhibition, these are mockups and it may be empty inside.
so to me it seems like they have been development going on for almost 10 years on it
and there is the tendency of the russians to have multiple different seekers for the same missile
for example:
Kh-29
R-27
so it might be the case that they have the capebility of the Kh-38MT but simply dont want to use it for some reason, like cost, not being suitable for the strike missions they are doing or simply a low suply of them
Im not, ive stated I’m not 100% sure it doesnt exist, just that current evidence overwhelmingly points to it not existing. I am fully willing to admit it exists if someone provides evidence beyond 15 y/o mockups and some brochures.
Multiple is a stretch. Theres either 1 mockup pictured at 2 seperate MAKS, or 2 mockups at MAKS 2009.
The Su-75 checkmate is advertized for export despite only being a mockup. Its possible they were looking for additional funding or expertise for the other variants and it never came through.