Even vehicles require a high mission score
Thanks for the replies.
I don´t care much about the events, so I didn´t even think about it…
But it shouldn´t be so difficult for gaijin to adjust the points for rocketing airfields during the events.
1 Like
They should have just tie the tewards to the effort.
So killing a plane a bomber in gunner view gives little reward. Bombing should give little reward with an automated bombsight.
Wirhout gunner view or bombsight the rewards should be medium for bombing and for kills high.
Killing a plane on the ground should give little reward as well.
And so forth
1 Like
It’s not that hard for them to do many things but they never do unfortunately.
In SL & RP, but in match points no, and that’s what counts for the event.
That’s why we only have zombers during events.
do you want to fly or discuss endlessly? pointless discussions and pure time-wasting, because nobody gives in. the “PvE” player will never give in and neither will the others.
pure waste of time
It’s better not to write in chat, if they insult you and you respond to the same level, you can get banned with a reason …
For just killing zombers, they are not gonna ban you.
3 Likes
So how do you bomb at all without using the bombsight? Dive bombing in a Lancaster?
Or do you mean CCIP/CCRP?
In which case, dive bombing in Tornado?
1 Like
If they insult you, report them.
If you respond to the same level, you break the game rules as well and potentially face consequences.
Exactly. You’re not doing anything wrong when you engage enemy players. They are part of the objective, after all.
So dogfighting should also give less rewards if using missiles? = /
4 Likes
I feel sorry for Sea-Vixens :P
No i just mean the regular bombsight.
It is supposed to be a punishment for using arcade features in sim (like the automated bombsight which shouldn’t exist).
Sure bombers with bombsights and multiple gunners have little to no way to get many rewards. But they shouldn’t have been implemented in sim the way they are either.
No, why would you draw this conclusion?
What kind of mental gymnastics is this?
Those obviously are punishments for using arcade features in SB, that shouldn’t exist in a combat flight sim.
Like bombsights that are modelled as being automated while being manually operated in real life.
I don’t see why people are still trying to debate it…
From me mentioning what it was to the people telling me that I didn’t have stats to play sim, so I couldn’t talk and wouldn’t knoiw what was going on, yet I KNEW this was going on.
Half of the issue was people NOT REPORTING IT.
It’s not the ‘zombers’ that everyone will coin, it’s not the normal players going out and playing the game… It’s about the collusion of people to make PASSIVE rooms, and then attacking and abusing, and teamkilling those who didn’t follow thier demands.
Again, the issue is that no-one was really reporting it, and again, when I raised the concern, people tried gatekeeping me.
1 Like
Had one guy get so pissed at me the other day that he stopped kamikaze ramming the AF and tried to come after me, but I immediately beat him in a dogfight and he rage quit. Was rather satisfying.
5 Likes
radar missiles : true
I class that as unsporting behaviour as it’s akin to telling the enemy where your teammates are camping. When you do that, you’re disclosing the teams tactics and spoiling the game.
1 Like
Just report the player in battles and state the reason (e.g., exposing friendly allies location etc).
1 Like
Which of the in-game report categories is best for reporting people who are engaging in that kind of behaviour normally?
1 Like
Although I personally favour the “others” category, in general, it is far more important that players clarify the reasoning in the in-game report rather than sending in reports that are just random letters or numbers. This really aids in understanding the problem and facilitates the handling process. Hope this helps!
1 Like