There’s also other methods which currently, because the CDK is a problematic thing, doesn’t welcome new people that well.
Seeing as things have been released, there may be some better things made soon.
There’s also other methods which currently, because the CDK is a problematic thing, doesn’t welcome new people that well.
Seeing as things have been released, there may be some better things made soon.
It’s all a bit of fun my friend,I think the forum is too uptight anyway,people need to chill.I did find the “Great No CAS poll kick off” amusing though.
Take care Bro
We already had that, but the AAA was so overpowered that anybody who came as close as 2km to the tank battlefield was automatically blown up.
We should revisit it…
If it was advance to the rhine that was a bug/mistake implementation…
Iirc the AI AAA I am speaking of was removed before advance to the rhine was even added to the game.
It was only in place for a few months back in 2014.
You’ve proven absolutely nothing about what I said ‘wrong’, you’ve just shown yourself to be a statchecker to merely dismiss any interaction and debate on the premise that you deem others inferior.
If You are suggesting something, then You should be able to back up Your words with something. If You can’t it means that either:
If You don’t understand that, then You are really the one which makes discussion pointless. We can all say what we want, but it comes down if what we say is true (effective).
I don’t even think you can accumulate all of which I suggested, because you’re sole argument is my stats for at least half of this thread…
The fact you rely on that to dismiss everything, in every thread, shows that you, are the one incapable of actually engaging and discussing anything.
That highlights your issue, and with that, I’m actually done with toying with you.
Statcheckers can go suck eggs… Precious numbers bud…
If You suggest using SPAA, then You should be able to prove that it is effective. If You can’t then either:
Sorry but in real word no one really cares what You say as long as You don’t have anything to prove it. Real discussion requires You to show some proof to back up what You are saying. If You can’t provide it, then You are no different than flatearthers.
Wonder if eddie is ready to apologize for the outburst, or whether that guy from the other thread who had no unlocked SPAA is ready to actually play the game that they are trying to rather than neglecting an entire subset of vehicles for the sake of ignorance…
I wonder if one day You will be able to provide anything to back up Your words. Maybe then we could really have a discussion. As much as You try to dismiss it, it shows how first option is more accurate.
Deterrent… Google it… Your ignorance is based on your arrogance, and you are the one who can’t accept it because it means that you, were wrong.
Wow two similar poles and a million No CAS threads .Dry your eyes mate ,tissues are next to the PC monitor no doubt :)
Don’t worry, even as an average player with a lot of bail outs effecting “muh stats” and the fact not every CAP spawn finds enemy air to counter I have certain planes not used in ARB showing a high number of CAS can be stopped this way. Imagine if I were better and more focused on just stats!
Of course when this has been pointed out before certain members go all out to discredit using completely flawed logic, but I no longer have to be trolled by those particular members 👍👍
Fact is a knocked out CAS saves your team from that CAS however you find ways to do it. No stats are required as it is just logical.
Why be so rude? The poll is active, does the same but more than your own poll, is not “hidden”.
You now know a direct link to a very relevant poll that is superior in yours because Richardguy put the effort in, so what is your problem? Why try to turn my comment onto a flame war?
Edit: and a player hiding behind a secondary account. You really should check the TOS.
Now to make a poll on a poll as to whether people want a poll for a poll to get a poll on whether the poll should be polled…
Yes, mock me more because linking offends… enjoy.
Great. If it works there needs to be something to back it up with. Can’t wait to see how well the SPAA works as people have said. We all know planes are better than SPAA but the point was made about SPAA effectivness
Can you not read? I am not sure if you are being disingenuous on purpose here.
Normally The forum shows similar posts normally and I would have expected a similar poll to show.
No need to get so excited about a new member not spotting an old post like its a hideous crime and an intended slight ,it wasn’t .
In Fact the pole was mostly to show that people don’t really want a no CAS option even when it is only an option which I fail to see why.Seems like an ad hominem thing against the supporter’s ,who knows?
Nothing rude about it ,I even did my best attempt at a smiley face,I also gave a like to your previous comment which I actually agree with .Always handy to keep the kleenex near the PC haha