Support for a No CAS Game option for GRB Poll

Wonder if eddie is ready to apologize for the outburst, or whether that guy from the other thread who had no unlocked SPAA is ready to actually play the game that they are trying to rather than neglecting an entire subset of vehicles for the sake of ignorance…

1 Like

I wonder if one day You will be able to provide anything to back up Your words. Maybe then we could really have a discussion. As much as You try to dismiss it, it shows how first option is more accurate.

2 Likes

Deterrent… Google it… Your ignorance is based on your arrogance, and you are the one who can’t accept it because it means that you, were wrong.

2 Likes

Wow two similar poles and a million No CAS threads .Dry your eyes mate ,tissues are next to the PC monitor no doubt :)

Don’t worry, even as an average player with a lot of bail outs effecting “muh stats” and the fact not every CAP spawn finds enemy air to counter I have certain planes not used in ARB showing a high number of CAS can be stopped this way. Imagine if I were better and more focused on just stats!

Of course when this has been pointed out before certain members go all out to discredit using completely flawed logic, but I no longer have to be trolled by those particular members 👍👍

Fact is a knocked out CAS saves your team from that CAS however you find ways to do it. No stats are required as it is just logical.

2 Likes

Why be so rude? The poll is active, does the same but more than your own poll, is not “hidden”.

You now know a direct link to a very relevant poll that is superior in yours because Richardguy put the effort in, so what is your problem? Why try to turn my comment onto a flame war?

Edit: and a player hiding behind a secondary account. You really should check the TOS.

Now to make a poll on a poll as to whether people want a poll for a poll to get a poll on whether the poll should be polled…

Yes, mock me more because linking offends… enjoy.

Great. If it works there needs to be something to back it up with. Can’t wait to see how well the SPAA works as people have said. We all know planes are better than SPAA but the point was made about SPAA effectivness

2 Likes

Can you not read? I am not sure if you are being disingenuous on purpose here.

Normally The forum shows similar posts normally and I would have expected a similar poll to show.
No need to get so excited about a new member not spotting an old post like its a hideous crime and an intended slight ,it wasn’t .
In Fact the pole was mostly to show that people don’t really want a no CAS option even when it is only an option which I fail to see why.Seems like an ad hominem thing against the supporter’s ,who knows?
Nothing rude about it ,I even did my best attempt at a smiley face,I also gave a like to your previous comment which I actually agree with .Always handy to keep the kleenex near the PC haha

If something is really effective then there is something to back it up.

If one is saying that vechicle „a” is great then he should at least do great in said vechicle.

2 Likes

But all I did was link the poll you said you did not know existed, now you troll me. Okay…

And forgetting I linked the poll very early on to show this. I am not sure why you thinking being helpful is a negative but you be you.

All I did was link it. So again, what is your problem?

There are players who have killed more planes using tankS that using aircraft in ARB

No you made a number of comments earlier which seemed over the top to be honest.You certainly didn’t appear to make any positive contribution to the conversation

I love CAS but what’s the point of voting no? There will always be enough players to play in normal mode and everyone will have what they want at least

3 Likes

Of course. The MGs mounted on tanks are Effective, but they are in most based limited with the angle they can aim at

The suggestion was to prevent CAS nefring as well

1 Like

And many with SPAA

Would like to know them :). I have never doubted what can be done but rather if it is really Effective

1 Like

So you have ignored what I wrote. OK. I am not engaged in the debate and was mainly pointing to the other active poll this duplicates.

But on the other matter I have already covered what you are replying with.

And @BoveyBadBoy69 I was not having a go at you but showing you, it is your choice to react how you have, yes? And yes, this new forum layout/way it works is terrible and makes older posts almost disappear. I do not think anyone disagrees with that.

1 Like