I see, never knew about that folder.
There are/were some unrelated folders like the brigand and whirlwind ifrc
On the folder topic, I find it odd how the B-25J 1 and 20 aren’t foldered, same with the Stuart 1 and 3 and T-28 (1938) with it’s base production.
I actually wrote a similar suggestion about sub tree rework, but I don’t think it’s got excepted.
It would look something like this.
This would section off the sub TT from the main one and give it some individualality instead of being splattered in the main TT.
I also think you should be able to research a vehicle from the sub TT at the same time as the main, to further give the sub TT there own individualality.
I think I’ve seen you mention your concept in another topic as well.
I like it a lot, reminds me of how nations used to be organized in older versions of the game.
Yeah, I had it suggested like that initially as well. But someone pointed out that it would also split each battles RP earnings more and make research feel slower with that.
So I made a poll about it to see what players thought, and shared research won with 90% of the votes. Generally I’d say this is probably the most convenient for most players, but if this is something more people care for I might redo the poll and see if I can get more than 30 players to vote on it.
But if you can research two vehicles at the same time how does the br of a match split between the two vehicles
It’s kinda pointless
Well that confirms my thought that it has no point, it’s the same as a shared research except worse. At the end of the day you still take the same amount of time to unlock two vehicles, except you get them both after a long time instead of having one first and another afterwards
Yeah, I agree just focusing on one vehicle at a time is what most people would want anyways, so it streamlines the process and doesn’t really take anything away.
I just think they should double the rp rewards so you don’t lose anything. It would make the sub TT feel more like there own tree as well, but gaijin wouldn’t do anything that would make the grind better.
Nah, at this point just make the grind lighter, with the folders system nothing would force you to grind the subs so I don’t see why they should be grinded faster than others vehicles… imo the rp cost of vehicles just has to be dropped at higher tiers because the inflation when you progress through a tree is just crazy
Generally I hope Gaijin realizes that the more vehicles are in the game, the less RP and SL each individual one should cost.
But this isn’t really the point of the suggestion since I don’t really have a way to quantify it, and economy changes like that are always very hard to sell to Gaijin as something worth their time and effort.
The cost to br is currently exponentialish, it should at least be linearish that would help a lot
Tbh I’d even considering paying GE for a folder unlock if the right nations were added.
Hell nah don’t give gaijin ideas
I’d rather no nation is locked behind a paywall.
If you want to support nations being added that money is probably better placed in premiums from that nation. Buying a premium for a nation would also automatically unlock it anyways, since that’s also how it functions for Israel now.
I agree with that no nation should be locked behind a paywall.
But at the same time, I see where he is coming from, as if it takes being locked behind a paywall for a home, I’d take it(even if I’d rather it be free)
I see where he is coming from too, and I support options to skip unlock requirements like how it is when buying Israeli premiums.
But I also think making an entire nation exclusively paid goes against what this suggestion is meant to do. I don’t like subtrees like Finland where most unique domestic vehicles are locked as premiums or old events, and this would be a more advanced version of that.
I understand Gaijin want to make a profit, but there is many more reasonable options through this reworked system than making paid nations.
For sure, but as StormRyder said, if my options were paying for access to a decent representation of Australia and Canada versus what we have now, I’d pay up. But free would be better.
Fair, I’d pay for a rework too if I could. I just don’t like the idea of forcing this onto players that don’t care as much, even if it already sort of happens with nations that only have premiums in game so far.
But there’s not much of a chance Gaijin would do this anyways. I think it’s far more profitable to keep making money by just selling premiums for these nations. Especially once we get to unlock requirements, where Gaijin could leave the option to skip them to buy a premium.
I think most players would rather buy a premium vehicle that also unlocks a tree compared to paying to just get access to the tree without getting a premium alongside it.
And at the same time keeping all nations free generally will paint them in a positive light too, so people might be a bit more inclined to spend money this way too.
I may get about shared research if it’s GRB, but how about Air RB where you only play 1 vehicle and dies with it? (unless it’s like you research what you picked on like we have rn)
Shared research here only means you select one vehicle to research (per type, so air, ground, naval, etc.) and your battle reward from all vehicles of the same type goes towards that, same as you have now. It’s not split again by nation.
Sn air it just works as it does now, you select one aircraft to research and that’s where your reward goes.
