I agree with that no nation should be locked behind a paywall.
But at the same time, I see where he is coming from, as if it takes being locked behind a paywall for a home, I’d take it(even if I’d rather it be free)
2 Likes
I see where he is coming from too, and I support options to skip unlock requirements like how it is when buying Israeli premiums.
But I also think making an entire nation exclusively paid goes against what this suggestion is meant to do. I don’t like subtrees like Finland where most unique domestic vehicles are locked as premiums or old events, and this would be a more advanced version of that.
I understand Gaijin want to make a profit, but there is many more reasonable options through this reworked system than making paid nations.
2 Likes
For sure, but as StormRyder said, if my options were paying for access to a decent representation of Australia and Canada versus what we have now, I’d pay up. But free would be better.
2 Likes
Fair, I’d pay for a rework too if I could. I just don’t like the idea of forcing this onto players that don’t care as much, even if it already sort of happens with nations that only have premiums in game so far.
But there’s not much of a chance Gaijin would do this anyways. I think it’s far more profitable to keep making money by just selling premiums for these nations. Especially once we get to unlock requirements, where Gaijin could leave the option to skip them to buy a premium.
I think most players would rather buy a premium vehicle that also unlocks a tree compared to paying to just get access to the tree without getting a premium alongside it.
And at the same time keeping all nations free generally will paint them in a positive light too, so people might be a bit more inclined to spend money this way too.
1 Like