I can interrupt you any moment with r77 and force you to go multipath or notch and lose you missile. Or do the same if su39 gets r27er with datalink. And if you go multipath I can use 16 vikhrs that ignore multipath. And of top of that twin barrel instagib gsh30.
Not that one sided actually.
Also if it gets r27r/er it should get r27t/et as well. So su39 could sneak one or two and catch you off guard.
1 Like
Incorrect? Yes.
Lying? No.
Way to try to skew the argument lol. Total bad faith argument on your part.
But thanks for reminding me the F-4S gets Aim-7Fs which are better than sky flashes (pretty much the same missile, but you love to nitpick after all and claim I’m lying)
Won’t really mean much, with detailed modules the plane will lose all combat ability once it gets hit even if it structurally survives.
Can’t use Vikhirs. The R-27s go on the Vikhir pylon.
Just as the R-77s go on the R-73 pylon…
How many times do I have to say this?
I can if I decide to not use r27s. Or could put 1 r27 on 1 pylon and 8 vikhrs on another if its possible irl.
They have completely different burn times and turn profile. This is like acting if an aim-9J is an aim-9L.
R-77s outrange all aim-7 variants post arh buff. Even datamined stats shows this.
2 Likes
So, you simply ignored why the “Su-39 shouldn’t have the R-77” part and just moved toward the Skyflash front?
It is a simple fact that F-4S doesn’t use Skyflash because we literally didn’t export to the US.
If you didn’t mistake Sparrows for Skyflash
You wouldn’t be called a liar at all.
Think twice before posting a comment instead of knee-jerk posting.
It is quite funny that you call the AIM-7F and Skyflash ‘pretty much the same missile’
Only YOU and Gaijin think like that, and that is why the F-4J(UK) is staying at the same BR as the F-4J/S.
Skyflash is an AIM-7E-2 variant, while AIM-7F is an AIM-7F. And Skyflash is worse than the AIM-7F outside of 5km range.
So, let’s head back to “why we shouldn’t give the R-77 to the Su-39 because it will nail the coffins.” which you ignored. Shall we?
Ah yes, infamous overpowered F-14IRIAF (higher BR than Su-30MK2/MKK) and F-14D (2nd most dogshit arh missile in game only behind another aim-54)
IRIAF argument would’ve made some sense if it were still 13.0.
3 Likes
I use the Su-25T which is the tech tree version. I get 2 R73’s and 2 R60’s. I also carry 4 napalm and 2 20 mm cannon pods and do alright. You need to side climb and wait for everyone to merge. No one looks up to 25,000 feet after the merge. I drop my napalm from up high and fire the missiles on aircraft at lower altitudes. You just need to relearn how to play it since the BR change. Just my opinion.
I think this post is talking about its GRB br use, not ARB.
Oh hey look I have another follower lol.
Might have better burn time, but it’s ARH capabilities are quite bad.
Uh huh, yes your majesty.
As if you don’t make errors, next time I will propagandize it like you do. :)
I’m so glad the resident Su-39 expert hasn’t flown it at all, and has 0 experience in it.
Let alone in simulator.
Go pester someone else.
Another day of reminding you your sim experience has no relevance in a thread about arb/grb, and fakours are still stupidly easy to notch.
2 Likes
ahhh…I assumed since he was talking about getting uptiered often an ARH missiles that he was talking about ARB.
at this point all I can say is skill issue, you don’t know how to use the missile and probably don’t give it good launch conditions
I don’t have the su-39, but I managed to ge a 3.0 KDR (I think its closer to 2 or 2.5 if only players were counted) on the A-10C, and I didn’t play it much, just 27 games, still stock grinding it.
Granted my winrate is poor because often most of my team dies out before I even reach the battlefield.
My funniest moment with it:
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Watch out, he’ll pull the “erm aktually i only play sim” card
1 Like
