Su-39 Current BR is unbearable ( 11.7 )

Because subsonics with arhs at 13.0 are terrible? It’s not that hard to understand.

there’s 3 su-25s in russia TT already.

Yet some people still like to play them and it should be a option if people wish to use it
Plus I understand I just don’t have the same opinions as you

Yeah last time I checked theirs multiple of the same vehicles in game and I never heard of their being limits. theirs 3 f14 TT yet theirs 3 f14 suggestions so like I said I’m pretty sure their isn’t a limit

You have a whole lot of
image

Actually there are a decent amount of honest people on here.

You, john, and a few others however, are not :)

Imagine being so low you have to make everything about ego lol.

AND MOST IMPORTANTLY: The Corb YTer did NOT face IRIST OR SPAA`s WITH ARH OR IR ADVANCED IRCCM MISSILES IN THE VID, HE ONLY FACED ADATS WHICH IS OK AND OTHER EASILY DODGEABLE SPAAS NOT THE MODERN NEXT GENERATION ONES.

Its the same as Su-25T in airframe, the Only notable difference are its weapons suite and electronic upgrades. And that is one match from Other Matches, Entrop may differ from match to others.

Dont get me wrong, Its Very nice, But It also suffers from the Constant face of the Enemy Air defenses.

AND AS U CAN SEE IN THE VIDEO, HE ALSO LAUNCHED R-73 which none of them hit the enemy plane.

Like you do?

1 Like

But this thread is about adding R-77/27 to current Su-39, which would bump it into 13.0 territory.

Just because there’s no limits does not make playing multiple variants of them inherently fun. Just look at Israel tree with the 10 something magachs.

I dislike the idea of “adding copy paste for the sake of copy paste”

Not Forcefully, EVEN if it did not receive its ok BUT it will need to receive its Electronic Counter Messure capability Against Air to air and Surface to air Threats.

Maybe because:

  1. you do not actually fight them every game unless your lineup is 12.7?
  2. you suck at defeating those SAMs

Currently not modelled at all outside the first Nuke Thunder event, so you’ll have to wait for that.

it’s already one of what?
3 planes that have IRCM?

My lineup is literally 11.7 the same as Su-39 AND I DO get uptiered every match ( Not always but 90 PERCENT of the time ).

No I do not “Suck” by simply expressing my Opinion about this plane current Capabilities, I am a skilled player.

Unfortunately true, But hopefully we will see When the ECM capability gets added infuture.

Yet you struggle to preflare IRIS-T

NOT that kind of IRCCM, That is against HEAT SEEKING Missiles From butt generation like Aim9L\J\G\B.

THIS one IS PROTECTING FROM RADAR THREATS THE MORE ADVANCED ONES.

I did explained that before.

Yet you couldn’t/wouldn’t demonstrate it

I Was not Talking about that kind of “demonstration” I was Talking about how the Su-39 Gets uptiered and the problems it faces WHEN it gets uptiered. I really hope you read My original Thread and not actually assuming.

You do realize that I also agree it would be a 13.0 aircraft with ata missiles witch is why I’m recommending to make a suggestion thread for a 13.0 su39 w/r77 or r27 or both

Than don’t play them some people have preference and that where having options is amazing🤨

So like the f14D or jas37di because it won’t be like those it would be more like f2a / f2a adtw

What? It’s literally bad game design? Imagine if DCS is just 20 copies of F-16s. Or if GRB is made up of full teams of shermans. That’s just lazy.

Still copy paste for sake of copy paste. Just because I consider the ADTW a good plane does not mean I don’t consider it copy paste.

You’re complaining about standard issues of a vehicle getting uptiered
Wow crazy
Almost like a plane is supposed to have issues when that happens

X vehicle having issues in a full uptier aren’t reasons for it to get “buffs”

If it was having issues at its own br then you have an argument.