Coming from you, thats a compliment.
I didnt get creamed in duel i myself initiated.
1 Like
Having options of different variants is great just look at all the t-series/ Sherman tanks for example each vehicle has its thing also wtf does dcs have to do with war thunder
When that “happens” it supposed to get solved.
“buffs”? I just said the Plane have such problems and will be a good thing to provide it with a thing that all the other vehicle DO have it in its BR RANGE.
It seems your the one having argument here.
Not when said variant is redundant and is also worse.
It’s an example.
Lol that’s why their balanced to those variables
Pretty sure that’s comparing apples to oranges
Bad game design is bad game design. You can have the opinion that having copy paste slop is good. It does not make it good game design.
We have five tomcats of which at most three will be played. That’s by definition redundant.
I dont mean anything but, it does make it Accurate to what a nation do have in real life.
I respect ur opinion tho.
I’m curious to know how many people would agree that having options of different varieties of the same vehicle is “bad game design” especially because some people asked for some of them
Look up the opinion on the Israeli ground tree and you’ll see a majority will agree it’s copy paste m60 slop.
Again, you can “ask” for copy paste slop. It’s still slop.
Why would it be 13.0 with R-27s? I could understand 12.3 with 27ERs…
But 13.0 is excessive even with R-77s again I wouldn’t believe it would be above 12.3
For example, the AV-8B+ gets 4x A-120s, 2x 9Ms, has a good radar, better visibility out of the cockpit, higher top speed / better acceleration.
Meanwhile the Su-39 if equipped with either or, would only be able to carry:
2xR73 or R77
2xR27 or Vikhirs
At the very least it should get R-27Rs to attempt to even the playing field for it a bit.
Given it’s slower than the AV-8B+ means its AAMs are almost always less effective due to the lower launch speeds.
We could also compare the F-14D at 12.7 (in sim)
Which sports 640 cms, an option for 6 ARH AAMs (or some Aim-7ms if you prefer them), and 2 Aim-9Ms… all with a VERY good radar, and VERY good flight performance for launching Aim-54s.
I say the best solution is keep it 11.7 but give it R-27Rs.
Or
12.0 with R-27ERs
Or
12.3 with R-77s
A duel? I asked to test things lol.
If anyone made it a duel, it wasn’t me.
And I proved BVR is king, because it forces WVR.
So what? It’s the same BR as the F-16XL. Every subsonic with arh is at this BR.
Ah yes because 11.0 facing ERs is peak balans
This is just delusional
You dying to pressure missiles is not proof BVR is king. It’s proof that BVR isn’t guaranteed to kill while WVR is.
Again, why is it that the rafale, with the shortest range arhs in game, considered better than the Typhoon? Hint: It’s not BVR.
You started it vro
3 Likes
It’s not because that’s what’s supposed to happen in an uptier?
Like what?
IRCM?
vikhrs?
tgp?
1 Like
The point is there are no AA systems below 12.0 that can even begin to contest/fight the Su-25T/Su-39, it’s at the BR that it is because it’s A2G capability is vastly superior to lower BR AA systems/strike aircraft, plus being one of a handful of planes capable of effectively fighting helis(Vikhrs/brimstones).
Additionally most ground maps have enough cover to get good approaches/CAS runs, if you can’t find them that’s a you issue.
A dedicated ground striker being unable to contest a multirole/fighter plane is completely reasonable, especially since every R-73 in that video was launched from unfavorable aspects.
1 Like
It do because it happens 90 percent of a time, Which is eventual.
IRCCM only Prevents AIM9L\G\J\H\B the early Variants not the stronger ones.
Vihkrs Are useless if u cant get to the battlefield without dying.
TGP CANT track Static Targets Like SPAA or tanks, ONLY moving Targets which IS not practical.
Still irrelevant because that’s now how we balance vehicles
haeee?
I want to see proof of that one
There is SPAAs that DEFINITELY CAN Contest\fight Su-39 ( Su-25TM ) EFFECTIVELY while maintaining the same Balance weapon scheme as Su-39 SUCH AS: ADATS ( TWO VARIANTS ), FLAKRAKPANZER, AND STRELAS, AND STORMER, AND TYPE 81 ( C ), and TYPE 93 and much more.
Its not superior its equal, The SPAA can Counter them. Such as ADATS or flakrakpanzer.
All planes can kill helis, if u cant that is ur issue.
CAS is a mechanic ingame if u dont want it that is ur opinion.
AND I DID answer, AND I WILL answer it again, DEPENDS ON BOTH factors: 1. YOUR PLANE missile: Angle of attack, IRCCM effectiveness, CAGE\UNCAGED SEEKER SYSTEM, G-PULL Value, AND SPEED and performance.
AND THE ENEMY: SPEED, Angle, IRCCM Counter, Flares amount, Etc.
For ARB 13.0 is the lowest for modern fox 3 even if it only can carry two like the F-5TH TCU(f16XL should be 13.3) Without fox 3 I can see it going lower depending on the missile (and if major decompression ever happens)
(In arb I don’t play sim)
640cm w/4x aim9m come at a cost of giving up two radar guided missiles and aim7m are more reliable than using aim54 I only take two aim54 now in days also not to mention the amount of weight and drag the aim54 cause to use them also I don’t see why you would compare fighters to attack jets like that obviously their potent aircraft meant to take out other aircraft also I wouldn’t say the f-14D FM is very good I would say it just good the radar is vary good but held back by the radar missiles it has in game
1 Like
The irrelevant thing is to bring an aircraft that has no protection from TOP TIER PLANES AND SPAA`s to Them in the first place.
Sure I will provide it.