su39 can carry 6 ARMs while su25T only gets 2 significantly worse ones
In real life the su-25T also can get more, but gaijin is being gaijin so no wonder.
I think it can carry also the 4x Kh-25MPU aside from the 2x Kh-58 using the L-081 Phantasmagoria pod.
almost like that was my point, although the person I was responding to was comparing the R-60 to the R-73, so…
well. enjoy. ur su 39. snails is happy. it is what metters most XD.dont forget there are reasons for no refunds XD… snail knows. u are not happy. . but hes is happy so.D
Or could just hide behind those mountains on the right and pop up with kh58u from around 5 km.
im profesional noob so. for me up tier down tier does not changes thing. i mostly die just from exsissting in game.
drag coefficient between 7P/77 is similar (around 1.4), but 77 has much more more delta V (30% more). Further compounded that 77s are fnf missiles so you dont even have to hold lock while it does its thing. At almost all engagement distances 77s will hit first.
Some example statshark graphs:
tbf, the R-73 is not too good at range
Me: slings 120A at you, kills you, you sling 5 R-77s, they all miss.
I’ve flown plenty of R-77 equipped aircraft. They’re crappy. The R-77 generally tracks poorly. It is very easy to multipath / chaff / flee from.
Meanwhile my track record with 120 equipped planes is far less, I still am scoring a lot more kills per launch.
That’s funny, because air counts ai ground units as normal ground units.
Check my AV-8BNA stats if you don’t believe me.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
I know, I don’t play ARB on Su-39
But there is no way to tell. Grb / arb stats count under the same area.
AIM120 and R-77 have the same seeker properties, you can confirm it yourself with datamines
Idk, Su-27SM was very good on release.
R-77 is a good missile, just don’t try to use it for BVR and you’ll be fine, treat them like MICAs and you’ll be fine. Tho I didn’t play it after recent buff, it might actually be decent for BVR now, what I can tell is that it is absolutelly nasty for close shots now.
Su-27SM actually has a good radar for it, avionics, speed, HMD, etc.
Unlike the MiG-29SMT radar which was bugged initially… but still honestly worse.
But further more, the Su-39 merely uses a MiG-29(3-19) radar if I’m not mistaken.
Meaning it would be worse for guiding a R-77 or R-27.
And it lacks and and all of the elements that make the SU-27SM good.
Isn’t odd, if R-77s are so good, why are my kdrs and win rates much worse for red for? (Apart from 2 vehicles, which were used when the great ER war happened)
Meanwhile the USA team is doing much better?
Tack on the fact, most of my bluefor deaths are due to being team killed… so if you cut out 2/3 of them… it paints an even prettier picture.
Uniquescorpion is competing with AlvisWizla and Boeing747
And if r77s are so bad why top 1 and top 3 kps are occupied by r77 slingers?
Also f16 with much less battles than premium mkk (available to any timmie with 70 usd) is only 0.01 kps above 3rd place
Well thats your stats and your experience, mine stats and experience with AIM-120A/B and R-77 tell that they are pretty balanced relative to each other.
Maybe the way R-77 is required to be used is not your playstyle. You need to try to see outside of your experience and reflect on it.
Even global stats also tell R-77 and it’s carrier are matched to AIM-120 and it’s carriers.
Well with Mig-29s it’s the carrier issue not the missile.
Just to claify I never participated in discussion about giving Su-39 and R-77 or R-27 and that it will be good with them.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
?
They carry the same amount
8
I suggest knowing what you’re talking about before talking about them
Not important
More important