That may be the case, however the 9L can be as easilly flared as the R-60M
The R-60M is faster off the rail and pulls more G.
The gap between the R-60M and L is closer than the gap between the G and the R-60M
If u use 9l rear aspect with in 2km 9/10 times missile gonna ignore flares. I used both missiles trust me 9l are so much better than r60ms
9Ls do not have any resistance that R-60ms also dont have
A 18g( it’s 18 right?) missile the same as a 35-40g? Cmon man, they’re not even the same. Once I learned about ARH I can probably count the amount of times on one hand I ever died to an aim54 again. Not even close to the same thing as an aim120 even if it’s an ARH.
Thats IRL
Not in wt
2 Likes
well it work in WT too. I used r60m rear aspect like 100times. I never seen single time it ignore flares
The 9L’s gate sure helps
Things like the Phantom FGR2 fighting them at 13.0 is stupud. 12.7 is just insane. R-27ERs are still OP and it has a LOT of them
1 Like
Sure, doesn’t work like that in game though. Both missiles have the same resistance.
If it went to 12.7 it would just slaughter 11.7/12.0
Eurofighter just has to go up to 15.0
3 Likes
F-14B at 13.0 with 9L
Fox 3’s are Fox 3’s my guy, doesnt matter what they pull.
nah, phoenixes are not comparable to normal fox3s and neither are fakours really
Doesnt change my point, fox 3’s are still fox 3’s, as long as they have a ARH seeker, they are fox 3s.
ok so why make this point like anybody didnt already think that
Some guy told me that there shouldn’t be any fox 3 carriers in 12.7, I just proved him wrong.
only if he is speaking as if he isnt already accounting for the fakour and phoenix.
more american players need to learn this, unfortunately they are too ignorant to understand. they cant fully develop by base bombing in the F-4S sadly
Ahhhhhhh
No it already silly it is lower then the F3 late