Oh god, how many times do i need to try to say it?
There is TWO different SIM modes.
Ground AND air?
Holy shit dude. you post ground, NOT air.
How hard is it to understand? Are you baiting or something?
If you play 7.7 france you face 9.3 China and Russia.
Never trying that again
I’ve noticed that people with bad english tend to get confused very badly by the whole “room list” aspect of air sim EC.
See this thread:
Way air sim has set up made it look like a unofficial custom battles thing with no rewards and it took a while to explain how it works.
The name is Simulator Battles. SB and I want to make ground and Air task flight. I know exactly where I get in Air Battles but is not the way I want to play. I was talking About the picture I upload above and I post here again.
Then you should skip using the F-100 at that BR range.
There are things even more unbalanced than that in ground sim
So your option for me is doing somewhat else instead of balance SAMs and Fighters in same tier Era…
Hey then This is not Simulator Battles. Roland and Strella-10 they both were totally operational at 80s. There is not reason an MiG-21PFM, Mig-21S or F-100 face such SAMs. It’s hard to do things the right way and fair way
The Strela is early 70s, so it operated as in the same era as MiG-21 and the F-100 though, so it is something that would face eachother if the cold war kicked off
1 Like
They all are 60 fighters. They last event till 90 but as complement only. They were top fighters at 60s. So the only way I found to solve this problem is search them with HARM air units such is not in WT now and also improve the tactical maps as a realistic tactical map such is also no in road map.
Honestly HARM missiles and better Tactical Maps are a must in incoming updates.
It’s not a f*cking way to do an accurate search with the yellow mark if that tactical map is an authentic trash that not represent what you have on sight from above.
Hopefully Gaijin work on that because I spent my money on this game to get result with my work. It’s impossible without HARM missiles and with that tactical map from Pirates Era
That bracket is perfectly balanced. I farm kills against those SAMs in things like the Jaguar Gr1A, Jaguar IS or AMX A-1A.
If you are using a vehicle from the bottom of the bracket then of course you’ll struggle.
I enjoy the 2S6 facing those planes with a good player in them.
You have the usal brainless A10 coming in straight and low for free SL and RP, but mentioned planes circling the battlefield up high is much more fun to face
2S6s are a pain in the butt to deal with, but yeah, 30k ft GBUs deal with them though and the soviet never used CAP
Got a Jaguar at almost 10km earlier today, still seems like there are a lot of players thinking it still have only 8.5km range.
At long ranges (5+km) the missile is easy to dodge as it’s energy runs out.
At 2-5 the 2S6 missile is very effective.
Usually the only player to play SPAA in my teams so extra points for me.
Even at higher tiers you often face teams with no SPAA in the start, as a heli enjoyer i find pleasure in that
Always funny to see someone feel entitled to bombing defenseless players in ground vehicles.
You want to bomb them, so you pick a plane, they don’t want to be bombed- so they pick SPAA
If you don’t want to die to SPAA then pick a tank instead of a plane
1 Like
What you saying is nonsense. HARM missiles and better Maps are regular hardware/tools in warfare. If you want to tune battles that way then the name simulator should be removed.
I’d say it’s weird that you’re upset about the “simulator” part and not the “ground” part since you have 12 hours of play time in fighters, 9 hours in attackers, just over an hour in bombers, and barely 33 minutes in tanks.
A 13 year old game isn’t going to change anything just to let you bomb defenseless players just because you spent money on premium planes
1 Like
If you want to fly planes, come fly planes with us in AIR SIM EC.
I’ve sent you a detailed tutorial how to play in AIR SIM EC.
In Air SIM EC you have objective-oriented gameplay and far more balanced (a relative term, busted planes exist and convoy SPAA is terminator-scale accuracy. Guy in an ostwind hits a plane flying 600 km/h 3 km out on a rocky desert terrain)
You’d enjoy it far more than trying to force planes into a primarily tank versus tank game mode.
Bit old, but still gold:
1 Like
That’s true. I just have 18 years spent in another simulators. My records doesn’t tell anything about what should I request or not. New or older people may freely request what they want we pay the same price. Or you have another special discount for your longevity?
You are complaining that GROUND VEHICLES played by REAL GROUND PLAYERS are making your AIR VEHICLES harder to use in a game mode primarily intended for GROUND VEHICLES where air vehicles are SUPPORT.
We are TRYING TO HELP YOU by telling you to use your AIR VEHICLES in a game mode dedicated for AIR VEHICLES so that you do not get grief by REAL PLAYERS using GROUND VEHICLES to shoot you down. You will still be shot down by other players, but they will be in (usually, sometimes there’s broken ones) aircraft you can play around and compete with and it’s a FAIR FIGHT for BOTH SIDES. There are also ground vehicles CONTROLLED BY AI which are VAGUELY period accurate (ostwinds/GAZ SPAA for WW2 brackets, Gepards for early vietnam aircraft, idk what’s happening in the BVR magic land - highest I fly is 10.3.
2 Likes
You are aware that HARM will do absolutely nothing against SPAA like the Strela and Gepard right?
The only ones it might be good against is the 2S6 and OSA.
There is nothing wrong with the CAS vs SPAA balance at that BR. Id actually go as far as to consider it fairly even. I want HARM, sure, but more the PvE element in Air Sim rather than within GRB/GSB for dealing with SPAA.
I’ve never had issue in GSB gaining air superiority at that BR
Again, if you want to play in planes you have to contend with SPAA. If you do not wish to contend with SPAA then you can play GROUND simulator battles in a tank, or air simulator battles
You’re literally using “I spent money” as an argument to demand that players on the ground have no counterplay to you