No not convenient comrade, advanced russian engineering to make steel just thick enough to block spall but thin enough to not create any /s
Classic “exterior” fuel tank plus flat ERA destabilisation
xD this makes sense ,You must love you country
You should simply say that all Russian tanks are too weak. Russia should join the T14, T15, Obj195, and Obj640. I will support you. I promise xD
1 Like
Thats obvious fact supported by both your and mine stats, i shouldnt even say that out loud xD
I dont think the addition of them would help, but as much as i want CATTB i also want Obj.640 and Yatagan.
NONONO Yes, it would be more appropriate to give the Russian team 2500 SP when they start the game
Now you`re just being
Im not your negbourhood mini-mart employee, and you being
wont make me upset xD
3 Likes
When a person can endure a 38% winning rate in the game, he certainly won’t be angry about almost anything. I really admire this aspect (of course, not the 38% winning rate itself)
Ah thank you thank you. I always deemed to be a short fuze type of a man. That really makes me proud
They’re still pretty fast while going forwards, meaning they’ll be competitive at reaching good spots first.
They aren’t limited by the NATO hump so they can shoot at all directions without moving their tank.
Lack of a turret basket makes them more likely to return a shot even if penetrated.
Autoloader makes their reload speed consistent and also enables players to spend crew skill points elsewhere, as Reloading skill is useless.
They’re smaller in general, making them easier to hide and harder to spot.
Your “point” was constructed on your poor reading skill.
2 Likes
Depends. Only T-80 is fast, stuff like T-90M is among the slowest to accelerate at top tier, only being challenged by the Black Night.
NATO hump is niche problem that’s mainly noticeable on Leo.
Lack of turret basket but low crew and a powder keg on tracks.
Autoloader would be fair point on non BVM T-80, even Level 0 Abrams has 6.5s reload.
Smaller profile is honestly not a great point imo, the size difference is not noticeable when spotting.
2 Likes
My stance is that RU tanks are not completely forced to get hit, but are far more likely to, and have to play passive to avoid it. They get hit in a scenario where NATO tanks wouldn’t. If there’s 2 targets, you shoot 1, he has 2 more seconds to push and shoot you vs something like Abrams, so you’re forced to pick your engagements wisely and avoid that. If your team starts folding or you need to reverse from a peek, you can’t, so you have to be selective with that. Etc etc.
It just makes for an insufferable experience that handicaps gameplay and forces you into passive playstyle to avoid getting shot, which is not how wt plays.
Only T-80’s has they ability while in return they have abysmal reverse speed compare to NATO tanks which makes them subpar in overall mobility.
You must be getting pretty desperate if you actually mentioning about NATO hump.
Its a niche feature that doesnt come into clutch 90 percent of the time while NATO tanks can easily turn around by using neutral steer if they spot an enemy that comes from the back.
NATO hump will also not gonna matter if you get shot from the back because you will most likely gonna die anyway.
Assuming you didn’t lost your autoloader, didn’t get blow up or lost 2 of your crew members in the first place, tho I agree they should recieve their fluid system alongside with other basket modules.
You will not gonna hide from Thermal imaging system unless you sit behind back an actual cover.
If Russia tank really handicaps gameplay
Then why are Russian players always the most numerous at any time?
FOTM. You also don’t see good players spamming RU MBTs.
So, Russian tanks are better in most average level players’ games, right?
Only T-80 is fast but overall they are one of the fastest at top tier , using the “only fast” is kinda downplay the tank a bit . But overall it is still the armour that people complain cause they can’t lol pen a T series in any vehicle of their choice. So frankly , people here do not give a shit. Gotta justify the hate and the armour is what the people latched on the most.
Despite I’m pretty sure T-80 is much much better than T90M simply because of the mobility and the 0.5 second reload. But just the mobility alone make the T80 is better than all the Chally and the Ariete we have in the game.
But it will always come back to the armour cause the game have a lot of inconsistency , which some of them are literally pillar that keeping this game alive btw , cause stuff to not happen when they should. Shell can just not pen when it should , ammo not explode , jet bouncing off ground , hitting tree when you didn’t even touch the tree,…
Which like happen to all tank but RU get a lot of shit for some reason.
3 Likes
Not really. You could argue they have low skill floor but at the same time you make one mistake and the tanks many flaws will likely get you killed.
NATO tanks are just better because they are more versatile.
At least in my opinion, the turret steering mechanism of Russian tanks should be big, and the shell of the BMPT turret ammunition should be 100% explosive
Just for reference
1 Like
your gonna have to redo the cr2s they got there gear ratios changed (other than the 2E)