Russian Bias in 2026?

So basically since Mi-28NM has global K/D of 2.27

Spoiler

and AH-64E has global K/D of 2.44

Spoiler

then, by your staitment… AH-64E is not bad and the JAGMs, even with incorrect flight path and being intercepted by the current Pantsir S1, are better at killing then the “muH oP” LMURs…

…ergo, all the bitching about Mi-28 and LMUR is just becous its russian… and all the bitching about the new Patsir is for the same reason.

And that, my friend…here we are now

1 Like

It might be even though your global stats are misleading since they include Mi28NM stats before the LMUR addition.

No the bitching is there, because it’s still selective realism to the benefit of a single tech tree

You keep asking that as if anybody here owed you an answer, like why don’t you do it yourself? Grab a t-72/t-80 and win games yourself to see if they are really that good as you claims lol maybe grab the bmpt?

Bro just go to stat shark select Jan 2026 and select heli and select 13.0
What did you do? lol?

1 Like


23 10.7 GRB games played in a row (as the U.S.).

10 victories, among them :

  • 6 victories against Russia ;
  • 4 victories along with Russia.

So Russia got 13 + 4 = 17 victories out of 23 games => 17/23 = 73.91% winrate.

I said I didn’t make the maths but knew NATO winrate would be between 0-30% lol.

Huh, what can I say except russian bias

Just did and show it (NATO side though).

Fair enough

Spoiler

Mi-28NM with 2.65 K/D

AH-64E with 2.26 K/D

Z-10ME with 2.78 K/D

Why is nobody calling the CM-502KG or the Blue arrow 11 OP? Why there aren’t threads like “The Z-10ME problem” ? Becouse it’s not russian… that is why.

CM502 have been bad after they have been released, they were good in the Dev server, but useless on live server, explains why they added BA11

main issue of the Mi28NM is that it can counter any heli, even the new ones without any problems
and the fact its LMURS have absurd loft compared to any other helicopter fired ATGM

Meanwhile, my M1A2 Abrams:

image

1 Like

Because the Z10 despite being better suffers from the same selective realism problems

Comrade, comrade you missing again… pls look at the spawn number between Z10ME and M28MN

it is better for air to air and air to ground due to the selection
but if you wanna fight off other helis mi28NM wins no doubt

I dont know… I dont have it. I just look at the stats, becous someone said that “stats mather”. I usually avoide commenting on vechicles that I personaly haven’t used… but cince people that havent a single USSR/Russian vechicle coment on them… well F it… I will do it to.

Comrade, ever heard of data analysis? Its a legit job. Comrade should learn it too

1 Like

the CM502KG were good in dev server, always going for turret roof top, and since it only has HE warhead you might get lucky an overpressure the tank, it did hit 7/10 times so it wasnt to bad, but on live server it went for front plate, or straight up for tracks and it didnt do any damage, best outcome you could have gotten was a crit
RARELY a kill

so they complained and added the BA11 which are good
i do take my Z10ME with 8 Ty90s and 8 Ba11, best mixed loadout

but people still like the mi28NM more due to its effectiveness
you have a 30mm with apds, same as on bmp2
if you wanna go for helis with LDIRCM to help out your SPAAs you take 6 LMUR and 1 VIKHR pod since IR missiles wont do anything towards these helis

if you have enough spawn points, 1 single mi28nm can counter anything in 1 single match

:D :D :D :D
Guy is steamrolling games in 2-4mins :D :D :D :D
Please , try to be more instead 1 death leaver

1 Like

The bloke should try to play something beside the former empire and its commonwealth, before speaking about “data analysis”…

well usually I get swormed and gunned by jets and/or eat a brimstone…