I saw some USSR players in this post perfectly demonstrating a Chinese saying ‘a dead pig is not afraid of boiling water’——ah yes, although I cannot prove where the USSR is weak, I just want to stubbornly say the USSR is the weakest，NATO is toooooo op.
2 Likes
Their intention is as clear as the middle east sky right now
/s
1 Like
If you can’t deal with T-72B3 armor using rounds as good and better than 3BM60, there are guides on improving aim.
3 Likes
I wonder how can you say that so blatantly , as to reach to the top tier you`ll require to pass a tech tree with SLOWEST possible reloads throughout the tech tree. So you’ll spend them anyway, as to make IS-2 and T-34 at least competitive
I’ve accepted that years ago, which is why I wrote things I wrote.
Who said anything about returning fire ?
You can fire at an oblivious enemy coming up behind you without even turning your hull one bit.
Sorry but what you said here doesn’t change a single thing I’ve said.
Or a fuel tank eats your spall and you end up killing one crew member and an autoloader.
There is.
Even if you expose your tank, but less of it, you’re still hiding more effectively.
Them being smaller allows them to use more spots for this strategy.
If you’re interested in higher tiers, you should just speed past through IS-2 and T-34 ranks in matter of days anyways.
Your 100-200 games are statistically insignificant considering those tiers have millions of games every single month. RU peaks at 57.9% WR on 11.3, which is far away from your doomsday 70-80-90%.
3 Likes
Have you ever consider this is also include the braindead premium based matches?
1 Like
Yes. And that suggests what? The Russian vehicles are just better for noobs, but it’s like saying just because noobs can’t handle the mobility of ABRAMS we need to say Abrams is bad. There is a tradeoff, just whether you are able to take the advantage or not.
1 Like
Still basically until 9.3 you`re to use loaders. If you dont skip them with high tier premium of course, but i thought it is a PROBLEM of the game, not a path
TLDR, remove those matches and RU still lead by a margin.
1 Like
Premium vehicles don’t really perform worse than their TT copies.
2 Likes
Hills are in favor of Russian tanks now ?
I have to remember that next time i try to peak one with 5 degree gun depression.
7 Likes
It does? Said protection was achieved based on BMVg’s testings.
You’re coping.
2 Likes
who are affiliate AF and basically create an advertisment material. Lol. You`ll be the first one to say “Its not proven because NII STALI tells lies!!!” if we reverse that
Sure, if you also remove any losses caused by similar matches on the NATO side.
SB and not RB but as I said before, Statshark 74% winrate for RU/CHI after LMUR release in october 2025. Steady ~64% winrate since then. So we’re not far from his doomsday scenario of 70%+ winrate for RU
RU CAS is overperforming, I don’t understand why people keep defending this situation so hard.
1 Like
Yes, both sides and RU still lead
1 Like
This topic is about RB.
1 Like
Thats the point…russians never peaked even when map wasnt altered because back in the days only Leos and Co. had enough gun depression and now only tanks like TKX with adjustble suspension have a chance but even them not very often. Thing is the strategy and tactics are still the same of russian tank drivers but now the maps prevent sniping them or flanking because everyone has to be in the ditches now. I can realy imagin there is people playing the game and have a big influence to the game designers and were crying about " Remove that hill on map XXXXX at grid A6 because they allways snipe from there" or “Put bushes at the corner at B5 on map XXXXX near the building because they allways ambush us from there” or like “Remove the area at the egde on map XXXXX at G2 because they allways flank from there” and “Please more hills we need cover” and so on and so on. This is exactly the pattern of the map progression in the last years!
1 Like