Never touch a BR over 9.7 man.
In low/mid BRs, they still kinda have the bias, but not as much as top tier.
Top tier is now unplayable as NATO.
1 Like
so what are we arguing about then?
yea might be mate but i am 55yrs and played war games like 30 yrs now and been waiting 20 yrs for a modern era of tanks. iam just tired of ww1,ww2 and cold war.
100% ! i also dont understand why they think adding a new pantsir was neccessary when sweden still has no good SPAA not even a top tier helo…
Because America got the SLAM ER so pantsir can shoot down all the subsonic missiles which lose track because of terrain guidance…
As a reminder :
What is that, 75% winrate average over hundreds of game ?
There is a serious bias issue
1 Like
some do more than they should (challenger)
1 Like
No, they don’t, they just don’t
1 Like
48 missiles on Pantsir…
1 Like
after reviewing my last battles in the winning team i was mostly paired with russia lol
1 Like
After this update with the new panstir, and previous being BMPT, i think it has confirmed now for me that Gaijin are trying to boost russian stats even more. They already have the best CAS and most survivable tanks (in my opinion) and now with both the buk and new panstir they can counter every cas thrown at them. They used to be subtle with the favouritism but now its definitely becoming more blatant.
5 Likes
I think no matter what someones stance on the existence of a bias is you have to admit that Gaijin is very obviously trying to pad russian top tier stats rn.
russia was not underperforming despite an underperforming BUK and Gaijin instantly went on to work on that gap instantly despite other trees having more problems in the SPAA department or generally having a rougher time in top tier.
6 Likes
Of course. If in theory, NATO nations have a “50%” winrate in top tier BRs, it’s because they count the games where you’re paired with Russia.
Vs Russia only, it plummets to 20-30% winrate easily.
After this update with the new panstir, and previous being BMPT, i think it has confirmed now for me that Gaijin are trying to boost russian stats even more. They already have the best CAS and most survivable tanks (in my opinion) and now with both the buk and new panstir they can counter every cas thrown at them. They used to be subtle with the favouritism but now its definitely becoming more blatant.
Exactly. It’s so, so obvious. Very sad path they adopted
1 Like
I saw some USSR players in this post perfectly demonstrating a Chinese saying ‘a dead pig is not afraid of boiling water’——ah yes, although I cannot prove where the USSR is weak, I just want to stubbornly say the USSR is the weakest，NATO is toooooo op.
2 Likes
Their intention is as clear as the middle east sky right now
/s
1 Like
If you can’t deal with T-72B3 armor using rounds as good and better than 3BM60, there are guides on improving aim.
3 Likes
I wonder how can you say that so blatantly , as to reach to the top tier you`ll require to pass a tech tree with SLOWEST possible reloads throughout the tech tree. So you’ll spend them anyway, as to make IS-2 and T-34 at least competitive
I’ve accepted that years ago, which is why I wrote things I wrote.
Who said anything about returning fire ?
You can fire at an oblivious enemy coming up behind you without even turning your hull one bit.
Sorry but what you said here doesn’t change a single thing I’ve said.
Or a fuel tank eats your spall and you end up killing one crew member and an autoloader.
There is.
Even if you expose your tank, but less of it, you’re still hiding more effectively.
Them being smaller allows them to use more spots for this strategy.
If you’re interested in higher tiers, you should just speed past through IS-2 and T-34 ranks in matter of days anyways.
Your 100-200 games are statistically insignificant considering those tiers have millions of games every single month. RU peaks at 57.9% WR on 11.3, which is far away from your doomsday 70-80-90%.
3 Likes