I still say that they’re BR’d correctly and the under-BR’d planes need to move up instead.
Excellent post none-the-less.
It’s sad how Reaf calls people names for being civil with each other.
I still say that they’re BR’d correctly and the under-BR’d planes need to move up instead.
Excellent post none-the-less.
It’s sad how Reaf calls people names for being civil with each other.
Maybe 7.7 is good for R2Y2 family and ONE BIG SURE 7.0 is perfect.
I don’t think moving the 7.0s - 7.7s down to 6.0 - 6.7 is a good idea.
We don’t need high BR prop BRs “recompressed” just cause 8.0 is “decompressed” in the wrong manner.
I mean how you said the MiG-29 was better than the M2K
Get in the R2Y2 and come and dogdight with your “superior plane”, i will use wep since in a game i can just not use it untill i run in to an enemy
A men.
And the R2Y2 is above you by a significant advantage not having to worry about lower thrust.
And I said M2K was better in a 1v1, and I said in the air RB context they were similar.
Lets see how the R2Y2 does against the F-80C
I am still waiting
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Since i showed him that he doesnt know what he is talking about when he claimed that the Mirage 2000 was better than the MiG-29, this is the second time he’s hidden his tail between his legs.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Yes, when he said that JH-7A wins vs F-5E
maybe ‘Still not Spaded’?
You want to get memed on again?
Last time I used the aircraft I said was worse than the Mirage 2000 in 1v1s: The Mig-29.
I gave you my rules for this as well, I will use the worse aircraft.
You bailed when I gave you these rules and now you’re claiming I bailed after you bailed.
I’ve been thinking about amended rules, but I keep thinking of ways someone that doesn’t want fair parameters to exploit that.
The preliminary alternative is large map 1v1, running out of fuel is a loss.
IDK why you can’t accept Statshark’s results.
He won against a F-5E while only having 1 mod on, JH-7A best dogfighter ever!!1!1!
You said it was worst, otherwise you wouldnt have done the 1v1, keep twisting your words and stop de-railing the topic.
Ah so you will play the R2Y 2 then? Nice
Nice try.
I’ve been thinking about amended rules, but I keep thinking of ways someone that doesn’t want fair parameters to exploit that.
The preliminary alternative is large map 1v1, running out of fuel is a loss.
You dont know how duels works, you dont get to say the rules.
IDK why you can’t accept Statshark’s results.
I accept Statshark graps, it is you (once again) that doesnt know how to read them.
So, you want to test the JH-7A + R2Y2, you playing the plane you claimed it was better? Or are you gonna bail again?
Hi All! Let’s avoid personal digs and keep things respectful, even if there’s disagreement. We want the forum to be a place for open discussion — not for taunts or gloating. Please stay constructive.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Here you go @AlvisWisla
Using your own argument so you cant report me for “taunts or gloating”:
I am one of the good players, not according to me but according to the game and third party systems.
I am one of the good players, not according to me but according to the game and third party systems.
Most comprehensive War Thunder statistics website. Find players' and squadrons' stats, compare missile performance & more.
As you can see, Im objectively speaking, better than you according to Statshark.
After playing the R2Y2 V1 and achieving a KD close to 10, I can confirm that this plane is a piece of garbage that cant do anything in 8.0, the only reason i got that KD and WR is because people at this BR is beyond bad and dont know what they are doing, but if a single one of them gets to use 2 braincells they will destroy me without even trying.
People runs more than you, accelerates more than you, retains energy better than you, not to mention the constant uptiers to 9.0.
I bet even a S.O.4050 Vautour IIN (Late) could win vs a R2Y2 V3 just draining his speed.
Get your facts straight before saying something in the forum because you mislead everyone with lies.
@Reaf_McCawley
I’ve literally never called anyone here any of those things.
I’ve never accused anyone here of anything.
In-fact, I let the blatantly false accusations against me sit on their own, cause smart people know that falsely accusing others of things they never did is an overreaction to their posts that are purely stating a different perspective.
“Admitting you make mistakes [editing their posts to fix mistakes] is gaslighting!” What a trash take.
If you genuinely believe that people admitting when they make mistakes is gaslighting, then your post is portraying you as never having admitted to making mistakes out of fear of being considered something negative.
If you don’t want your post to do that, I recommend editing it to change its meaning.
Go learn what gaslighting is: Gaslighting is not admitting when I make mistakes, gaslighting is not when I tell people their feelings matter, gaslighting is not when I constantly tell people that their perspective and memories matter.
Time for a PSA educational post about a word people on the forum use to demean others. TL;DR: Don’t accuse others of being delusional. Tell others their feelings matter. Tell others they’re equal to you. Don’t statshame. Tell others when you’ve edited a post to correct mistakes you made, and tell others they should always be honest with you in a PG manner. Gaslighting, with examples at the end. First source material: [5 Signs It's Gaslighting, Not a Disagreement] I acknowle…
@Leinadmix9_ツ
Just because an F-104A is faster than a Mig-19 doesn’t make the F-104A better.
War Thunder air RB is more than about speed.
And I’m glad you agree with me that 9.0 is BR compressed. That is no reason to reduce the BR of F-84G, MD452, etc just because of your very real feelings.
Wrong conclusion to the problem described.
Also your stats contradict your post.