Yes, if the guy’s only playing with a squadmate its possible he’s not. There isn’t much point of continuing this argument, its pretty much never ending.
It did historically have 360 degree traverse, but only while parked. As outlined in my previous post in this thread, the tank could not be driven with the turret traversed beyond a certain limited area; as the driver could not physically reach the controls any longer.
3 Likes
Couldn’t agree more with this mate, i try focus.on winning, not killing.
If i want a 4.0kd ill farm it up one death leaving
What do you mean?
Imagine it was implemented in wt but while on the move.
Fking mr strerch driving the tank
Allnationenjoyer was being himself higher in the thread and was arguing with Mademoiselle, a hardcore french main
1 Like
Aye half my comments are gone too was arguing way him as well.
Is what it is mate, bottom line everyone bar him alone says the amx m4 was under BRd
Hell barely spaded ive a 2.0 kd with it 4 deaths to 9 kills and ive played like 5 games.
Things brilliant for what it is and it had no right to sit alongside the m26 or most other 6.7s
Look at the likes of tiger 2 it has firepower and frontal armour, the amx can pen its turret cheeks and ammo rack it…
M26 well i dont need ti say anymore.
T26e1 sacrifices reload and mobility to have a decent round.
Is2 well again sacrifices reload for a banger of a gun…
Etc etc wrc
So yeah m4 is fine where it is at 7.0
1 Like
think its one of the few times where everyone who isn’t a bit of a S***stirrer agreed that moving up a vehicle was fair and logical
1 Like
Even alvis agreed man so it says it all
1 Like
i have him blocked and for some unknown reason the forum is a better place
Needs must but still shows the point doesnt it 😂
1 Like
AMX50(TOA100) and Lorraine are 100% overvalued, comparing to AMX50Surb or Somua, they needs to be 7.3, same for Char 25t, consider we have object 906 with STAB and heat, I have no idea why Char 25t could be 8.0.
1 Like
List them?
List?
You clearly do.
1 Like
This guy is straight up lying about watching replays/checking stats. He doesn’t even know my in game name currently as far as I know. Actual weirdo.
1 Like
I HAVEN’T PLAYED GRB IN DAYS if not A WEEK+
The last MANY DOZENS of my replays are all AIR REPLAYS
You are LYING.
Who the f* cares if somebody is a french main? I also play the tree lmao
1 Like
the AMX M4 shouldnt be 7.0, there I said it.
Now pull up my battle replays and records, im waiting buddy.
1 Like
I’d not worry about these guys, they have almost as much game knowledge as some squadron leaders, that is to say that they got none.
I don’t know why little bro is pulling some false battle records out of his ass to try and paint you as a bad person/player.
1 Like
AMX M4 and AMX 13 br changes were a mistake. They should go back to 6.7.
- The EBR 1954. can’t even reach its supposed strongpoint speed offroad, and on many maps, tracked vehicles maintain a higher average speed, thus fair better. this also should go back to 6.7
2 Likes
There isn’t even one safe argument where its fair to put AMX M4 at 7.0, T-44-100 is at 7.0 for USSR, it has similar pen, twice as long reload BUT better mobility, APHEBC! shell, a 12.7mm MG, twice as much armor in most points of the tank, AND it moves faster than the AMX M4.
The AMX-13 is also obvious ragebait or mental disability from gaijin, because in what world is it fair for AMX-13 to be the same BR as a T-92 light tank, the T-92 gets APDS, same speed, only slightly less armor which doesnt matter for a light tank, lower profile, ONE more crew member, a 12.7mm MG, aswell as a stabilizer. This is just ridiculous.
1 Like
Mostly agree but buffing the APDS pen on the 20mm can’t happen because that ammo is prolific across many guns in many nations and randomly boosting its stats for one tank is a dangerous precedent. If you have any proof the gun achieved a higher muzzle velocity or something with that same ammo, you’re free to present it.