not enough place in USSR for a subtree imo
1 Like
We can always do Britain implementation of Commonwealth vehicle, as in spread It all over the Place.
And of course my post gets flagged for literally no reason, how are people so sensitive?
It hurt the project manager who shoved Bhisma before Arjun little heart.
Agreed. Remove India, or at the very least anything not purely domestic, and give Britain an Australia+New Zealand or Canada subtree (but not both! That’s way too much!)
1 Like
India comes with multiple issues about its current implementation, the majority of which come from the fact that the sub-tree system from day 1 was a failure.
Heck, there is so little space in the UK tree at areas they can’t even get stuff they used (ex., Canadair Sabre F.4: The RAFs Best Aircraft Was ... Canadian?, which was built to UK specs and wouldn’t have existed with them ordering it). So the so all three nations need to fight each other for the limited space for their stuff due to the 5-line limit.
Also, between domestic, modified and licensed-built(note all count as unique), all the major commonwealth nations (India, UK, ZA, Canada & ANZACs) need at least 3 lines each for their stuff.
So I’d rather a new TT with a bit more C&P but room for unique stuff as TT rather than a ST with nothing but C&P.
I’d be fine with India staying a sub-tree(and more sub-trees) only if a rework happened, like ex. Subtree Rework - Nation Folders
5 Likes
As it is currently, India is fine in GBR, but I’d like to see it in its own seperate tree sometime soon. Kinda like how Israel was when it was initially added. I’d also like to see WT move away from national trees but rather to regional / military affiliation TTs, like having the Scandinavians as one singular tree, including vehicles from Finland, Sweden, Norway, Dennark, and so on. At worst, it’ll tick off some people, but at best it’s just a renaming of trees and an addition of more unique vehicles. They don’t even need to change the trees themselves, but rather just change the name. For example, Great Britain would be changed to GBR/Commonwealth to make note that it’s primarily Britain but it’s including stuff from the commonwealth nations.
That being said, Gaijin will probably never do this
2 Likes
theres no “remove from game entirely” so ill back a ASEAN tree. We cant redeem a Indian only tree either as they have not made enough good stuff to validate even being a subtree to begin with
Only two of the indian additions has met the vibe and style of the British TT vehicles and that’s only as its a C&P of a TT vehicle as a premium. everything else has been soviet junk nobody in their right mind wanted to dilute the uniqueness of the British tree.
2 Likes
true, however there are colonies which suit the British tree far better, Australia other than the M1 AIM is already all in the brit tree and it would make sense to formally have the anzacs as a British subtree
there’s also Canada.
both are much more British in culture and military doctrine so will fit in better.
3 Likes
They have lots of military connections actually, mainly in the aviation scene. They’ve had modernizations of their aircraft as well as continued use of Israeli AAMs. Second to Chile, it’s the next country that makes the most sense in Israel given the current military relations between the two countries. However that would be negating the past connection India shared and focusing more on the modern ones. At this current moment in time both India and Israel players would like this as an outcome, but they’d more prefer India as its own independent tech tee which is really can be. It’s be just as diverse on its own as something like the Israeli tree from my understanding, with indigenous aircraft like the Hal Tejas in the air tree.
2 Likes
Israeli systems, sights, shells (which are still currently used, just in a different designation iirc), radar, etc.
It would make sense for them to go there
3 Likes
my point stands.
2 Likes
Argentina was added as a nation placement (similar to Swiss vehicles in Germany right now) back before Israel was added as an independent tree.
That’s one single weapon, I agree it should not link a vehicle there, in the same way something using TOW missiles shouldn’t go to America by default. Had it been added today, I have a feeling the 2IP & 2C would have gone there given the connection, but the original TAM being in the German tree (and rightfully so) made sense and still does now, and having all the TAMs in one tree also makes sense.
Again, it’s more than just that. It’s Israeli radars on their aircraft (great example is the harrier they had with an Israeli radar, HMS, and Israeli AAMs), SPAA modernizations with Israeli radars, a lot of Israeli weaponry and Israeli FCS configuration for those weaponry, and much more. It’s not just the simple fact they use pythons and derby’s or spikes, it’s deeper than that.
btw India operated a few captured M48s iirc
and I absolutely agree that Israel needs more Pattons
1 Like
500000000 more magachs
3 Likes
I put as much effort into this as gaijin did into Israeli vehicle diversity
11 Likes
India is way less culturally, economically, and genetically different. Unlike NZ, AUS, or Canada, India already had a large significant native population before colonisation.
One thing that really p1sses me off is when people say it has too much C and P when it has less C and P than China
1 Like
Totally not Biased at all
Is that seriously the only justification you people come with? “India was colonised” India has mostly Russian, French, Israeli, equipment so it doesn’t make sense from a gameplay perspective to add every vehicle in the game to the UK. It also doesn’t make sense from a cultural perspective because besides cricket, tea (tea came from India and China), and English, Indians are nothing like Brits.