Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

You talking about that GÜRZ or whatever it’s called?

Honestly, I’m so desperate for top AA in this tree I will take literally anything.


image



and there is a lot of other spaa’s

16 Likes

I would take the Pantsir turret on the German truck :D

1 Like

What is that 2nd to last photo :O

The insult to injury about the pantsir is the TWS and 20km combo, as you said there is little you can do to coumter something (in a reasonable manner) that is only present through a small ? on most NATO CAS aircraft’s RWRs, not to say they are bad in any metric but it needs to be easier to identify and counter effectively without climbing to low earth orbit

3 Likes

Chinese Type 625E

1 Like

OSA is Mach 1.7 in game

tbh this…

Playing anything other than the US or USSR atm you cant really tell the difference between the F-15E, F-16C or Su-25SM/34 past a certain point. any and all SPAA is welcome.

also they need to rework the SP costs of air to ground ordinance so it actually increases based on the amount of ordinance your taking and not just the type, Reduce the cost of AAMs to make doing CAP easier, and reward players for shooting down air to ground ordinance.

2 Likes

The one above that, this one is sick af too

The only issue with Spyder SR/ER/MR/LR, is that they don’t seem to have any onboard radar.

For that, we’d require the absolute unit that is Spyder AIO :

spyder-cover

8 Likes

the only reason they have a bad FM is because the meta back then was the R27ER and no missile in the game came close to it for over 3 years… so as a shitty fix they nerfed the FM of both. the MIG 29 started out as a really good dogfighter against the f16A when it came out but now is super sad!
if they would redo the FM’s of the mig29 and su27 and made them how the mig29 was on release it would be quite even. so blame gajijn for adding the ER and making it unbalanced against NATO instead of just keeping with the R which is pretty close to the sparrow

(my winrate with the pansir is 80% XDXDXDXDXD in sim tho but still no one should have a winrate of 80%)

1 Like

Would it makes sense for GRB airfields to have Missile SPAA’s, and additionally RADAR sites, that could be linked to SPAA without onboard radar like the Spyder?

And currently in top tier grb, the airfields still use ww2 flak cannons

much worse, except short range mobility, it’s even slower than AIM-7F

2 Likes

I’m not complaining, I’m making the argument that there is no Russian bias, also the SU-27 FM is bad for meta because of the high AOA that the aircraft is famous for and the SMT is bad because it’s fat, which is accurate to real life

and the reason the r73 is somewhat lacking is because gajijn wanted to add them to the mig29 and that was super stupid. because the f16 only had the 9L and no irccm (and the magic 2 was super nerfed back then)
and they still have not fixed trustfectoring)

2 Likes

They should change to short range missiles, and move the airfields/air spawns back at least a few miles

Eh, correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t 2nd to last mean penultimate (in python/C# terms [-2]/[^2])?
The Chinese SPAA would be 3rd from last no?
I’m confused.

1 Like

yeah absolutely, and the distance between enemy airfields is laughable

Yeah, im dumb, lol. Should’ve said 3rd.

1 Like