Dance of Dragon - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

[永雏塔菲Taffy]

@Smin1080p_WT What will China gain?

[xxBLUxx]

Interesting name

[Smin1080p_WT]

@MAUSWAFFE

Though I’d argue that when both do have options, no matter who has more, those needed more should be added first. The Pantsir was added before the Type 81 because “Tunguska was lacking” after the missile patch, despite still outshining the Type 93 for the better part of 5 years at that point.

Unfortunately its not always as simple as what’s needed more comes first in some cases. There were some particular complications with the Type 81, as there can be with many pieces of Japanese equipment. Once they were understood and overcome, it was possible to add it.

The Pantsir is a much more widely known vehicle and easier in many ways to model.

[02ded]

@Smin1080p_WT

there are already 2 other Czech vehicles

whats the 2nd one

[Chris4win]

@AlvisWisla

Everyone calls it political.

The act of making every gaming forum political is annoying, you’re not being a warrior of social justice for doing that.

Calling the invasion of Czechoslovakia political would make ww2 political aswell you know? Every god damn pages of history would be political

[MAUSWAFFE]

@Smin1080p_WT

Sadly tree organisation would not be based solely on opinion alone, as there can be many reasons (game balance, research balance / composition) for the order and structure of trees.

Considering how quickly trees seem to be running out of space for the shiny, new and profitable additions I sure hope the devs might consider a certain rework in the future…

[Smin1080p_WT]

@02ded

whats the 2nd one

[UnHolySausage]

is it possible that once the talked addition of external radar vehicles to assist radarless spaa’s like the type 81 if such vehicles are added the ARH missile for the type 81C could be added?

[Texas_Engineer_Mike]

A would be kinda DOA and low BR

[Smin1080p_WT]

@UnHolySausage

is it possible that once the talked addition of external radar vehicles to assist radarless spaa’s like the type 81 if such vehicles are added the ARH missile for the type 81C could be added?

At the moment, we don’t have any new news to share in this area beyond what we said in the previous answers on this unfortunately.

[xxBLUxx]

[永雏塔菲Taffy]

Not good at all

[02ded]

ah yes that one

[KhorneFlakez1337]

Just because they are easy to add doesn’t mean they should be added.

Most other nations have 10 or less anti air vehicles, while the USSR tree has a total of 18 and is about to get their 19th one (yes, two of them are premiums, but the point still stands)

[MAUSWAFFE]

The ARH missile does not require external radar to work. It only requires it for search and datalink functionality, both of which being optional.

[UnHolySausage]

sad, i really hoped that with the addition of new ground targets for ARB it could serve as a way to put in GRB to assist radarless spaa’s

[actualsize123]

[UnHolySausage]

ik but still could be cool nontheless 2 birds with 1 stone

[Apollo_1641]

With two strikes already (and maybe more to come?) I am even more excited for potential vehicles that haven’t appeared in any leak.

[MAUSWAFFE]

Don’t get me wrong here, I’d love all of those features. I’m just saying denial for external radar doesn’t have to mean a denial for the ARH missiles.